Advertisement

Augmented reality in minimally invasive spine surgery: early efficiency and complications of percutaneous pedicle screw instrumentation

Published:September 28, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2022.09.008

      ABSTRACT

      BACKGROUND CONTEXT

      Augmented reality (AR) employs an optical projection directly onto the user's retina, allowing complex image overlay on the natural visual field. In general, pedicle screw accuracy rates have improved with increasingly use of technology, with navigation-based instrumentation described as accurate in 89%–100% of cases. Emerging AR technology in spine surgery builds upon current spinal navigation to provide 3-dimensional imaging of the spine and powerfully reduce the impact of inherent ergonomic and efficiency difficulties.

      PURPOSE

      This publication describes the first known series of in vivo pedicle screws placed percutaneously using AR technology for MIS applications.

      STUDY DESIGN / SETTING

      After IRB approval, 3 senior surgeons at 2 institutions contributed cases from June, 2020 – March, 2022. 164 total MIS cases in which AR used for placement of percutaneous pedicle screw instrumentation with spinal navigation were identified prospectively.

      PATIENT SAMPLE

      155 (94.5%) were performed for degenerative pathology, 6 (3.6%) for tumor and 3 (1.8%) for spinal deformity.  These cases amounted to a total of 606 pedicle screws; 590 (97.3%) were placed in the lumbar spine, with 16 (2.7%) thoracic screws placed.

      OUTCOME MEASURES

      Patient demographics and surgical metrics including total posterior construct time (defined as time elapsed from preincision instrument registration to final screw placement), clinical complications and instrumentation revision rates were recorded in a secure and de-identified database.

      METHODS

      The AR system used features a wireless headset with transparent near-eye display which projects intra-operative 3D imaging directly onto the surgeon's retina. After patient positioning, 1 percuntaneous and 1 superficial reference marker are placed. Intra-operative CT data is processed to the headset and integrates into the surgeon's visual field creating a “see-through” 3D effect in addition to 2D standard navigation images. MIS pedicle screw placement is then carried out percutaneously through single line of sight using navigated instruments.

      RESULTS

      Time elapsed from registration and percutaneous approach to final screw placement averaged 3 minutes and 54 seconds per screw.  Analysis of the learning curve revealed similar surgical times in the early cases compared to the cases performed with more experience with the system.  No instrumentation was revised for clinical or radiographic complication at final available follow-up ranging from 6–24 months. A total of 3 screws (0.49%) were replaced intra-operatively. No clinical effects via radiculopathy or neurologic deficit postoperatively were noted.

      CONCLUSIONS

      This is the first report of the use of AR for placement of spinal pedicle screws using minimally invasive techniques.   This series of 164 cases confirmed efficiency and safety of screw placement with the inherent advantages of AR technologies over legacy enabling technologies.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The Spine Journal
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Hirano T
        • Hasegawa K
        • Takahashi HE
        • Uchiyama S
        • Hara T
        • Washio T
        • et al.
        Structural characteristics of the pedicle and its role in screw stability.
        Spine. 1997; 22: 2504-2509
        • Cho W
        • Cho SK
        • Wu C
        The biomechanics of pedicle screw-based instrumentation.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010; 92: 1061-1065
        • Costa F
        • Villa T
        • Anasetti F
        • Tomei M
        • Ortolina A
        • Cardia A
        • et al.
        Primary stability of pedicle screws depends on the screw positioning and alignment.
        Spine J. 2013; 13: 1934-1939
        • Gautschi OP
        • Schatlo B
        • Schaller K
        • Tessitore E
        Clinically relevant complications related to pedicle screw placement in thoracolumbar surgery and their management: a literature review of 35,630 pedicle screws.
        Neurosurg Focus. 2011; 31: E8
        • Parker SL
        • Amin AG
        • Santiago-Dieppa D
        • Liauw JA
        • Bydon A
        • Sciubba DM
        • et al.
        Incidence and clinical significance of vascular encroachment resulting from freehand placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic and lumbar spine: analysis of 6816 consecutive screws.
        Spine. 2014; 39: 683-687
        • Sankey EW
        • Mehta VA
        • Wang TY
        • Than TT
        • Goodwin CR
        • Karikari IO
        • et al.
        The medicolegal impact of misplaced pedicle and lateral mass screws on spine surgery in the United States.
        Neurosurg Focus. 2020; 49: E20
        • Kosmopoulos V
        • Schizas C
        Pedicle screw placement accuracy: a meta-analysis.
        Spine. 2007; 32: E111-E120
        • Tian N-F
        • Xu H-Z
        Image-guided pedicle screw insertion accuracy: a meta-analysis.
        Int Orthop. 2009; 33: 895-903
        • Gelalis ID
        • Paschos NK
        • Pakos EE
        • Politis AN
        • Arnaoutoglou CM
        • Karageorgos AC
        • et al.
        Accuracy of pedicle screw placement: a systematic review of prospective in vivo studies comparing free hand, fluoroscopy guidance and navigation techniques.
        Eur Spine J. 2012; 21: 247-255
        • Nottmeier EW
        A review of image-guided spinal surgery.
        J Neurosurg Sci. 2012; 56: 35-47
        • Rahmathulla G
        • Nottmeier EW
        • Pirris SM
        • Deen HG
        • Pichelmann MA
        Intraoperative image-guided spinal navigation: technical pitfalls and their avoidance.
        Neurosurg Focus. 2014; 36: E3
        • Urakov TM
        • Chang KH-K
        • Burks SS
        • Wang MY
        Initial academic experience and learning curve with robotic spine instrumentation.
        Neurosurg Focus. 2017; 42: E4
        • Hu X
        • Lieberman IH
        What is the learning curve for robotic-assisted pedicle screw placement in spine surgery?.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014; 472: 1839-1844
        • Khan A
        • Meyers JE
        • Siasios I
        • Pollina J
        Next-generation robotic spine surgery: first report on feasibility, safety, and learning curve.
        Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2019; 17: 61-69
        • Siddiqui MI
        • Wallace DJ
        • Salazar LM
        • Vardiman AB
        Robot-assisted pedicle screw placement: learning curve experience.
        World Neurosurg. 2019; 130: e417-e422
        • Bäcker HC
        • Freibott CE
        • Perka C
        • Weidenbaum M
        Surgeons’ learning curve of renaissance robotic surgical system.
        Int J Spine Surg. 2020; 14: 818-823
        • Buza 3rd, JA
        • Good CR
        • Lehman Jr, RA
        • Pollina J
        • Chua RV
        • Buchholz AL
        • et al.
        Robotic-assisted cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screws using the Mazor X Stealth Edition (MXSE) system: workflow and technical tips for safe and efficient use.
        J Robot Surg. 2021; 15: 13-23
        • Morse KW
        • Otremski H
        • Page K
        • Widmann RF
        Less invasive pediatric spinal deformity surgery: the case for robotic-assisted placement of pedicle screws.
        HSS J. 2021; 17: 317-325
        • van Dijk JD
        • van den Ende RPJ
        • Stramigioli S
        • Köchling M
        • Höss N
        Clinical pedicle screw accuracy and deviation from planning in robot-guided spine surgery: robot-guided pedicle screw accuracy.
        Spine. 2015; 40: E986-E991
        • D'Souza M
        • Gendreau J
        • Feng A
        • Kim LH
        • Ho AL
        • Veeravagu A
        Robotic-assisted spine surgery: history, efficacy, cost, and future trends.
        Robot Surg. 2019; 6: 9-23
        • Léger É
        • Drouin S
        • Collins DL
        • Popa T
        • Kersten-Oertel M
        Quantifying attention shifts in augmented reality image-guided neurosurgery.
        Healthc Technol Lett. 2017; 4: 188-192
        • Wiltse LL
        • Bateman JG
        • Hutchinson RH
        • Nelson WE
        The paraspinal sacrospinalis-splitting approach to the lumbar spine.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1968; 50: 919-926
        • Beck M
        • Mittlmeier T
        • Gierer P
        • Harms C
        • Gradl G
        Benefit and accuracy of intraoperative 3D-imaging after pedicle screw placement: a prospective study in stabilizing thoracolumbar fractures.
        Eur Spine J. 2009; 18: 1469-1477
        • Staartjes VE
        • Klukowska AM
        • Schröder ML
        Pedicle screw revision in robot-guided, navigated, and freehand thoracolumbar instrumentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        World Neurosurg. 2018; 116: 433
        • Wang MY
        • Pineiro G
        • Mummaneni PV
        Stimulus-evoked electromyography testing of percutaneous pedicle screws for the detection of pedicle breaches: a clinical study of 409 screws in 93 patients.
        J Neurosurg Spine. 2010; 13: 600-605
        • Pennington Z
        • Judy BF
        • Zakaria HM
        • Lakomkin N
        • Mikula AL
        • Elder BD
        • et al.
        Learning curves in robot-assisted spine surgery: a systematic review and proposal of application to residency curricula.
        Neurosurg Focus. 2022; 52: E3
        • Schatlo B
        • Martinez R
        • Alaid A
        • von Eckardstein K
        • Akhavan-Sigari R
        • Hahn A
        • et al.
        Unskilled unawareness and the learning curve in robotic spine surgery.
        Acta Neurochir. 2015; 157: 1819-1823
        • Han X
        • Tian W
        • Liu Y
        • Liu B
        • He D
        • Sun Y
        • et al.
        Safety and accuracy of robot-assisted versus fluoroscopy-assisted pedicle screw insertion in thoracolumbar spinal surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
        J Neurosurg Spine. 2019; 30: 615-622
        • Blizzard DJ
        • Thomas JA
        MIS single-position lateral and oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion and bilateral pedicle screw fixation: feasibility and perioperative results.
        Spine. 2018; 43: 440-446
        • Mao JZ
        • Khan A
        • Soliman MAR
        • Levy BR
        • McGuire MJ
        • Starling RV
        • et al.
        Use of the scan-and-plan workflow in next-generation robot-assisted pedicle screw insertion: retrospective cohort study and literature review.
        World Neurosurg. 2021; 151: e10-e18
        • Yao Y
        • Jiang X
        • Wei T
        • Yao Z
        • Wu B
        • Xu F
        • et al.
        A real-time 3D electromagnetic navigation system for percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in traumatic thoraco-lumbar fractures: implications for efficiency, fluoroscopic time, and accuracy compared with those of conventional fluoroscopic guidance.
        Eur Spine J. 2022; 31: 46-55
        • Lieberman IH
        • Hardenbrook MA
        • Wang JC
        • Guyer RD
        Assessment of pedicle screw placement accuracy, procedure time, and radiation exposure using a miniature robotic guidance system.
        J Spinal Disord Tech. 2012; 25: 241-248
        • Molina CA
        • Phillips FM
        • Colman MW
        • Ray WZ
        • Khan M
        • Orru’ E
        • et al.
        A cadaveric precision and accuracy analysis of augmented reality-mediated percutaneous pedicle implant insertion.
        J Neurosurg Spine. 2020; 34: 316-324
        • Liu A
        • Jin Y
        • Cottrill E
        • Khan M
        • Westbroek E
        • Ehresman J
        • et al.
        Clinical accuracy and initial experience with augmented reality-assisted pedicle screw placement: the first 205 screws.
        J Neurosurg Spine. 2021; 36: 351-357