Advertisement

Rates and reasons for reoperation within 30 and 90 days following cervical spine surgery: a retrospective cohort analysis of the Michigan spine surgery improvement collaborative (MSSIC) registry

Published:September 21, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2022.09.005

      Abstract

      BACKGROUND CONTEXT

      Reoperation following cervical spinal surgery negatively impacts patient outcomes and increases health care system burden. To date, most studies have evaluated reoperations within 30 days after spine surgery and have been limited in scope and focus. Evaluation within the 90-day period, however, allows a more comprehensive assessment of factors associated with reoperation.

      PURPOSE

      The purpose of this study is to assess the rates and reasons for reoperations after cervical spine surgery within 30 and 90 days.

      DESIGN

      We performed a retrospective analysis of a state-wide prospective, multi-center, spine-specific database of patients surgically treated for degenerative disease.

      PATIENT SAMPLE

      Patients 18 years of age or older who underwent cervical spine surgery for degenerative pathologies from February 2014 to May 2019. Operative criteria included all degenerative cervical spine procedures, including those with cervical fusions with contiguous extension down to T3.

      OUTCOME MEASURES

      We determined causes for reoperation and independent surgical and demographic risk factors impacting reoperation.

      METHODS

      Patient-specific and surgery-specific data was extracted from the registry using ICD-10-DM codes. Reoperations data was obtained through abstraction of medical records through 90 days. Univariate analysis was done using chi-square tests for categorical variables, t-tests for normally distributed variables, and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests for variables with skewed distributions. Odds ratios for return to the operating room (OR) were evaluated in multivariate analysis.

      RESULTS

      A total of 13,435 and 13,440 patients underwent cervical spine surgery and were included in the 30 and 90-day analysis, respectively. The overall reoperation rate was 1.24% and 3.30% within 30 and 90 days, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed within 30 days, procedures involving four or more levels, posterior only approach, and longer length of stay had increased odds of returning to the OR (p<.05), whereas private insurance had a decreased odds of return to OR (p<.05). Within 90 days, male sex, coronary artery disease (CAD), previous spine surgery, procedures with 4 or more levels, and longer length of stay had significantly increased odds of returning to the OR (p<.05). Non-white race, independent ambulatory status pre-operatively, and having private insurance had decreased odds of return to the OR (p<.05). The most common specified reasons for return to the OR within 30 days was hematoma (19%), infection (17%), and wound dehiscence (11%). Within 90 days, reoperation reasons were pain (10%), infection (9%), and hematoma (8%).

      CONCLUSION

      Reoperation rates after elective cervical spine surgery are 1.24% and 3.30% within 30 and 90 days, respectively. Within 30 days, four or more levels, posterior approach, and longer length of stay were risk factors for reoperation. Within 90 days, male sex, CAD, four or more levels, and longer length of hospital stay were risk factors for reoperation. Non-white demographic and independent preoperative ambulatory status were associated with decreased reoperation rates.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The Spine Journal
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Marquez-Lara A
        • Nandyala SV
        • Fineberg SJ
        • Singh K.
        Current trends in demographics, practice, and in-hospital outcomes in cervical spine surgery.
        Spine. 2014; 39: 476-481
        • McCormack R
        • Michels R
        • Ramos N
        • Hutzler L
        • Slover JD
        • Bosco JA.
        Thirty-day readmission rates as a measure of quality: causes of readmission after orthopedic surgeries and accuracy of administrative data.
        J Healthc Manag. 2013; 58: 64-76
        • Epstein AM.
        Revisiting admissions- changing incentives and shard accountability.
        NEJM. 2009; 360: 1418-1428
        • Choy W
        • Lam SK
        • Smith ZA
        • Dahdaleh NS.
        Predictors of 30-day hospital readmission after posterior cervical fusion in 3401 patients.
        Spine. 2018; 43: 356-363
        • Lovecchio F
        • Hsu WK
        • Smith TR
        • Cybulski G
        • Kim B
        • Kim JYS.
        Predictors of thirty-day readmission after anterior cervical fusion.
        Spine. 2014; 39: 127-133
        • Atkins PT
        • Harris J
        • Alvarez JL
        • Chen Y
        • Paxton EW
        • Bernbeck J
        • et al.
        Risk factors associated with 30-day readmissions after instrumented spine surgery in 14939 patients.
        Spine. 2015; 40: 1022-1032
        • Wang MC
        • Shivakoti M
        • Sparapani RA
        • Guo C
        • Laud PW
        • Nattinger AB.
        Thirty-day readmissions after elective spine surgery for degenerative conditions among US Medicare beneficiaries.
        Spine J. 2012; 12: 902-911
        • Adogwa O
        • Elsamadicy AA
        • Han JL
        • Karikari IO
        • Cheng J
        • Bagley CA.
        30-day readmission after spine surgery.
        Spine. 2017; 42: 520-524
        • Bernatz JT
        • Anderson PA.
        Thirty-day readmission rates in spine surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Neurosurg Focus. 2015; 39E7https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.7.FOCUS1534
        • Pull ter Gunne AF
        • Mohamed AS
        • Stolasky RL
        • van Laarhoven CJHM
        • Cohen DB.
        The presentation, incidence, etiology, and treatment of surgical site infection after spinal surgery.
        Spine. 2010; 35: 1323-1328
        • Park P
        • Nerenz D
        • Ilyas A
        • Schultz L
        • Bazydlo M
        • Shujiw A
        • et al.
        Risk factors associated with 90-day readmissions after degenerative lumbar fusion: an examination of the michigan spine surgery improvement collaborative (MSSIC) registry.
        Neurosurgery. 2019; 85: 402-408
        • Park P
        • Nerenz DR
        • Aleem IS
        • Schultz LR
        • Bazydlo M
        • Xiao S
        • et al.
        Risk factors associated with 90-day readmissions after degenerative lumbar fusion: an examination of the michigan spine surgery improvement collaborative (MSSIC) registry.
        Neurosurgery. 2018; 85: 402-408
        • Kelly M
        • Eliasberg C
        • Riley M
        • Ajiboya R
        • Soohoo N.
        Reoperation and complications after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion and cervical disc arthroplasty: a study of 52,395 cases.
        Eur Spine J. 2018; 27: 1432-1439
        • Shousa M
        • Alhashash M
        • Allouch H
        • Boehm H.
        Reoperation rate after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using standalone cages in degenerative disease: a study of 2078 cases.
        Spine J. 2019; 19: 2007-2012
        • Talyor B
        • Hilden P
        • Behmer Hansen R
        • Nana A
        • Gillick J
        National rates, reasons, and risk factors for 30- and 90- day readmission and reoperation among patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.
        SPINE. 2021; 46: 1302-1314
        • Schafer E
        • Bazydlo M
        • Schultz L
        • Park P
        • Chang V
        • Easton RW
        • et al.
        Rates and risk factors associated with 90-day readmission following cervical spine fusion surgery: analysis of the Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative (MSSIC) registry.
        Spine J. 2020; 20: 708-716
        • Shimizu T.
        • Fujibayashi S.
        • Takemoto M.
        • Otsuki B.
        • Kimura H.
        • Ota M.
        • et al.
        A multi-center study of reoperations within 30 days of spine surgery.
        Eur Spine J. 2016; 25: 828-835
        • Medvedev G
        • Wang C
        • Cyriac M
        • Amdur R
        • O’Brien J
        Complications, readmissions, and reoperations in posterior cervical dusion.
        Spine. 2016; 41: 1477-1483
        • Bhashyam N.
        • De la Garza Ramos R.
        • Nakhla J.
        • Nasser R.
        • Jada A.
        • Purvis T.E.
        • et al.
        Thirty-day readmission and reoperation rates after single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus those after cervical disc replacement.
        Neurosurgical Focus FOC. 2017; 42E6https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.11.FOCUS16407
        • Cole T
        • Veeravagu A
        • Zhang M
        • Azad T.D.
        • Desai A.
        • Ratliff J.K.
        Anterior versus posterior approach for multilevel degenerative cervical disease: a retrospective propensity score-matched study of the MarketScan database.
        Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015; 40: 1033-1038