Advertisement

Clinical risk factors associated with the development of adjacent segment disease in patients undergoing ACDF: A systematic review

      Abstract

      BACKGROUND CONTEXT

      Cervical fusion for degenerative disorders carries a known risk of adjacent segment disease (ASD), a complication that often requires surgical intervention to relieve symptoms. Proposed risk factors for development of ASD include both clinical and radiographic patient characteristics. However, the true impact of these risk factors is less understood due to limitations in sample sizes and loss to follow-up in individual studies.

      PURPOSE

      To review and critically examine current literature on the clinical risk factors associated with development of ASD in the cervical spine following ACDF.

      STUDY DESIGN

      Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

      Methods

      We systematically reviewed the literature in December 2019 according to the PRISMA guidelines. Methodological quality of included papers and quality of evidence were evaluated according to MINORS and GRADE framework. Meta-analysis was performed to compute the odds ratio(OR)with corresponding 95% confidence interval(CI)for dichotomous data, and mean difference(MD) with 95% CI for continuous variables.

      RESULTS

      6,850 records were obtained using database query. Title/abstract screening resulted in 19 articles for full review, from which 10 papers met the criteria for analysis. There were no significant differences in gender (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.75–1.30), BMI (MD -0.09, 95% CI -0.46 to 0.29), smoking (OR 1.13, 95% CI 0.80–1.59), alcohol (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.70–1.64), diabetes (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.56–1.31), number of segments fused (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.64–1.16), and preoperative JOA (MD -0.50, 95% CI -1.04 to 0.04). Age (MD 3.21, 95% CI 2.00–4.42), congenital/developmental stenosis (OR 1.94, 95% CI 1.06–3.56), preoperative NDI (MD 4.18, 95% CI 2.11 to 6.26), preoperative VAS (neck) (MD 0.54 95% CI 0.09–0.99), and preoperative VAS (arm) (MD 0.98, 95% CI 0.43–1.34) were found to be statistically significant risk factors.

      CONCLUSION

      Patients with congenital stenosis, advanced age, and high preoperative NDI are at increased risk of developing ASD.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The Spine Journal
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Tobert DG
        • Antoci V
        • Patel SP
        • Saadat E
        • Bono CM
        Adjacent segment disease in the cervical and lumbar spine.
        Clinical Spine Surg. 2017; 30: 94-101https://doi.org/10.1097/bsd.0000000000000442
        • Sugawara T.
        Anterior cervical spine surgery for degenerative disease: a review.
        Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2015; 55: 540-546https://doi.org/10.2176/nmc.ra.2014-0403
        • Eck JC
        • Humphreys SC
        • Lim T-H
        • et al.
        Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion.
        Spine. 2002; 27: 2431-2434https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200211150-00003
        • Quan GM
        • Vital JM
        • Hansen S
        • Pointillart V.
        Eight-year clinical and radiological follow-up of the Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty.
        Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011; 36: 639-646https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181dc9b51
        • Kepler CK
        • Hilibrand AS.
        Management of adjacent segment disease after cervical spinal fusion.
        Orthop Clin North Am. 2012; 43 (viii): 53-62https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocl.2011.08.003
        • Goffin J
        • Geusens E
        • Vantomme N
        • et al.
        Long-term follow-up after interbody fusion of the cervical spine.
        J Spinal Disord Tech. 2004; 17: 79-85https://doi.org/10.1097/00024720-200404000-00001
        • Hilibrand AS
        • Carlson GD
        • Palumbo MA
        • Jones PK
        • Bohlman HH.
        Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999; 81: 519-528https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199904000-00009
        • Wang F
        • Hou HT
        • Wang P
        • Zhang JT
        • Shen Y.
        Symptomatic adjacent segment disease after single-lever anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: incidence and risk factors.
        Medicine (Baltimore). 2017; 96: e8663https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000008663
        • Radcliff K
        • Curry P
        • Hilibrand A
        • et al.
        Risk for adjacent segment and same segment reoperation after surgery for lumbar stenosis: a subgroup analysis of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT).
        Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013; 38: 531-539https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31827c99f0
        • Kong L
        • Sun C
        • Kou N
        • et al.
        Risk factors associated with clinical adjacent segment pathology following multi-level cervical fusion surgery.
        Medicine (Baltimore). 2018; 97: e13480https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000013480
        • Slim K
        • Nini E
        • Forestier D
        • Kwiatkowski F
        • Panis Y
        • Chipponi J.
        Methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS): development and validation of a new instrument.
        ANZ J Surg. 2003; 73: 712-716https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1445-2197.2003.02748.x
        • Zadegan SA
        • Abedi A
        • Jazayeri SB
        • Vaccaro AR
        • Rahimi-Movaghar V
        Demineralized bone matrix in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review.
        Eur Spine J. 2017; 26: 958-974https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4858-9
        • Zadegan SA
        • Jazayeri SB
        • Abedi A
        • Bonaki HN
        • Vaccaro AR
        • Rahimi-Movaghar V
        Corticosteroid administration to prevent complications of anterior cervical spine fusion: a systematic review.
        Global Spine J. 2018; 8: 286-302https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568217708776
        • Zadegan SA
        • Abedi A
        • Jazayeri SB
        • et al.
        Bone morphogenetic proteins in anterior cervical fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        World Neurosurg. 2017; 104: 752-787https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.02.098
        • Higgins JPT.
        Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses.
        BMJ. 2003; 327: 557-560https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
        • Guyatt G
        • Oxman A
        • Vist G
        • et al.
        GRADE - an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.
        BMJ. 2008; : 336https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD
        • Ahn J-S
        • Lee H-J
        • Park EJ
        • Ho-Seok L.
        Adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical interbody fusion using conventional plate versus zero-profile implant- A preliminary report.
        Ortho & Rheum Open Access. 2016; 3https://doi.org/10.19080/OROAJ.2016.02.555603
        • Ahn SS
        • So WS
        • Ku MG
        • Kim SH
        • Kim DW
        • Lee BH.
        Radiologic findings and risk factors of adjacent segment degeneration after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a retrospective matched cohort study with 3-year follow-up using MRI.
        J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2016; 59: 129-136https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2016.59.2.129
        • Bydon M
        • Xu R
        • Macki M
        • et al.
        Adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in a large series.
        Neurosurgery. 2014; 74 (discussion 146): 139-146https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0000000000000204
        • Kong L
        • Ma Q
        • Yu K
        • Cao J
        • Wang L
        • Shen Y.
        Survivorship analysis of clinical adjacent-segment pathology after single-level cervical fusion.
        Med Sci Monit. 2017; 23: 5083-5089https://doi.org/10.12659/msm.905062
        • Li J
        • Li Y
        • Kong F
        • Zhang D
        • Zhang Y
        • Shen Y.
        Adjacent segment degeneration after single-level anterior cervical decompression and fusion: disc space distraction and its impact on clinical outcomes.
        J Clin Neurosci. 2015; 22: 566-569https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2014.08.019
        • Song JS
        • Choi BW
        • Song KJ.
        Risk factors for the development of adjacent segment disease following anterior cervical arthrodesis for degenerative cervical disease: comparison between fusion methods.
        J Clin Neurosci. 2014; 21: 794-798https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2013.07.028
        • Wang H
        • Ma L
        • Yang D
        • Yang S
        • Ding W.
        Incidence and risk factors of postoperative adjacent segment degeneration following anterior decompression and instrumented fusion for degenerative disorders of the cervical spine.
        World Neurosurg. 2017; 105: 78-85https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.05.094
        • You J
        • Tang X
        • Gao W
        • Shen Y
        • Ding WY
        • Ren B.
        Factors predicting adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion treating cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a retrospective study with 5-year follow-up.
        Medicine (Baltimore). 2018; 97: e12893https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000012893
        • Lawrence BD
        • Hilibrand AS
        • Brodt ED
        • Dettori JR
        • Brodke DS.
        Predicting the risk of adjacent segment pathology in the cervical spine: a systematic review.
        Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012; 37: S52-S64https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31826d60fb
        • Komura S
        • Miyamoto K
        • Hosoe H
        • Iinuma N
        • Shimizu K.
        Lower incidence of adjacent segment degeneration after anterior cervical fusion found with those fusing C5-6 and C6-7 than those leaving C5-6 or C6-7 as an adjacent level.
        J Spinal Disord Tech. 2012; 25: 23-29https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0b013e31820bb1f8
        • Wada K
        • Tanaka T
        • Kumagai G
        • et al.
        A study of the factors associated with cervical spinal disc degeneration, with a focus on bone metabolism and amino acids, in the Japanese population: a cross sectional study.
        BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018; 19: 153https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2055-1
        • Okada E
        • Matsumoto M
        • Ichihara D
        • et al.
        Aging of the cervical spine in healthy volunteers: a 10-year longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging study.
        Spine. 2009; 34: 706-712https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819c2003
        • Kumagai G
        • Ono A
        • Numasawa T
        • et al.
        Association between roentgenographic findings of the cervical spine and neck symptoms in a Japanese community population.
        J Orthopaedic Sci. 2014; 19: 390-397https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-014-0549-8
        • Wu JC
        • Liu L
        • Wen-Cheng H
        • et al.
        The incidence of adjacent segment disease requiring surgery after anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion: estimation using an 11-year comprehensive nationwide database in Taiwan.
        Neurosurgery. 2012; 70: 594-601https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0b013e318232d4f2
        • Singh S
        • Kumar D
        • Kumar S.
        Risk factors in cervical spondylosis.
        J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2014; 5: 221-226https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2014.07.007
        • Lv Y
        • Tian W
        • Chen D
        • Liu Y
        • Wang L
        • Duan F.
        The prevalence and associated factors of symptomatic cervical Spondylosis in Chinese adults: a community-based cross-sectional study.
        BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018; 19: 325https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2234-0
        • Chen Z
        • Li X
        • Pan F
        • Wu D
        • Li H.
        A retrospective study: does cigarette smoking induce cervical disc degeneration?.
        Int J Surg. 2018; 53: 269-273https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.04.004
        • Wang ZC
        • Shi JG
        • Chen XS
        • Xu GH
        • Li LJ
        • Jia LS.
        The role of smoking status and collagen IX polymorphisms in the susceptibility to cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
        Genet Mol Res. 2012; 11: 1238-1244https://doi.org/10.4238/2012.May.9.2
        • Bai J
        • Yu K
        • Sun Y
        • Kong L
        • Shen Y.
        Prevalence of and risk factors for Modic change in patients with symptomatic cervical spondylosis: an observational study.
        J Pain Res. 2018; 11: 355-360https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S151795
        • Teraguchi M
        • Yoshimura N
        • Hashizume H
        • et al.
        Prevalence and distribution of intervertebral disc degeneration over the entire spine in a population-based cohort: the Wakayama Spine Study.
        Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2014; 22: 104-110https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2013.10.019
        • Alpantaki K
        • Kampouroglou A
        • Koutserimpas C
        • Effraimidis G
        • Hadjipavlou A.
        Diabetes mellitus as a risk factor for intervertebral disc degeneration: a critical review.
        Eur Spine J. 2019; 28: 2129-2144https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-06029-7
        • Morishita Y
        • Naito M
        • Hymanson H
        • Miyazaki M
        • Wu G
        • Wang JC.
        The relationship between the cervical spinal canal diameter and the pathological changes in the cervical spine.
        Eur Spine J. 2009; 18: 877-883https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-0968-y
        • Maiman D
        • Kumaresan S
        • Yoganandan N
        • Pintar F.
        Biomechanical effect of anterior cervical spine fusion on adjacent segments.
        Biomed Mater Eng. 1999; 9: 27-38
        • Park J
        • Shin JJ
        • Lim J.
        Biomechanical analysis of disc pressure and facet contact force after simulated two-level cervical surgeries (fusion and arthroplasty) and hybrid surgery.
        World Neurosurg. 2014; 82: 1388-1393https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2014.06.013
        • Li XF
        • Jin LY
        • Liang CG
        • Yin HL
        • Song XX.
        Adjacent-level biomechanics after single-level anterior cervical interbody fusion with anchored zero-profile spacer versus cage-plate construct: a finite element study.
        BMC Surg. 2020; 20: 66https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-020-00729-4