Advertisement

Why X-rays? The importance of radiographs in spine surgery

  • Matthew L. Goodwin
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid Ave, St. Louis, MO 63110 USA.
    Affiliations
    Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid Ave, St. Louis, MO 63110 USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Jacob M. Buchowski
    Affiliations
    Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid Ave, St. Louis, MO 63110 USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Daniel M. Sciubba
    Affiliations
    Department of Neurosurgery, Northwell Health Chair of Neurosurgery at North Shore University Hospital and Long Island Jewish Medical Center, NY, USA

    Institute for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Northwell Health and Chair of Neurosciences, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra Northwell, NY, USA
    Search for articles by this author

      Highlights

      • Spine x-rays/radiographs provide critical information not obtained in other advanced imaging.
      • Radiographs allow visualization of everything at once, including hardware and foreign bodies.
      • Upright radiographs are critical in analyzing alignment and dynamic pathology.
      • Radiographs are critical to both intraoperative localization and post-operative follow-up

      Abstract

      Despite the advances made in high-resolution spinal imaging, plain films (radiographs or x-rays) remain a cornerstone of evaluating and caring for spine patients in the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative settings. Although often undervalued when compared with more advanced imaging such as MRIs or CT scans, plain films provide surgeons invaluable information that other imaging modalities oftentimes cannot. In addition to their use during surgery for localization or evaluation of hardware placement, x-rays provide an overall image of a patient's spine, are useful in evaluating hardware complications, allow detailed assessment of alignment and stability and allow for repeated images in clinic during follow-up. Plain films continue to provide critical information that cannot be obtained with other imaging modalities, and they remain central to providing optimal care for spine patients.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The Spine Journal
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Roentgen WC
        On a new kind of ray(first report).
        Munch Med Wochenschr. 1959; 101: 1237-1239
        • Molina CA
        • Theodore N
        • Ahmed AK
        • Westbroek EM
        • Mirovsky Y
        • Harel Ran
        • et al.
        Augmented reality–assisted pedicle screw insertion: a cadaveric proof-of-concept study.
        J Neurosurg Spine. 2019; : 1-8https://doi.org/10.3171/2018.12.spine181142
        • Pennington Z
        • Cottrill E
        • Westbroek EM
        • Goodwin ML
        • Lubelski D
        • Ahmed AK
        • et al.
        Evaluation of surgeon and patient radiation exposure by imaging technology in patients undergoing thoracolumbar fusion : systematic review of the literature.
        The Spine Journal. 2019; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2019.04.003
        • Wildhack WA
        Instrumentation - Revolution in industry, science, and warfare.
        Science. 1954; 120https://doi.org/10.1126/science.120.3121.15a
        • Yao R
        • Zhou H
        • Choma TJ
        • Kwon BK
        • Street J
        Surgical site infection in spine surgery: who is at risk?.
        Glob Spine J. 2018; 8: 5S-30Shttps://doi.org/10.1177/2192568218799056
        • Springfield DS
        Radiolucent lesions of the extremeties.
        J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1994; 2: 306-316
        • Sebaaly A
        • Grobost P
        • Mallam L
        • Roussouly P
        Description of the sagittal alignment of the degenerative human spine.
        Eur Spine J. 2018; 27: 489-496https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5404-0
        • Laouissat F
        • Sebaaly A
        • Gehrchen M
        • Roussouly P
        Classification of normal sagittal spine alignment: refounding the Roussouly classification.
        Eur Spine J. 2018; 27: 2002-2011https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5111-x
        • Sebaaly A
        • Gehrchen M
        • Silvestre C
        • Kharrat K
        • Bari TJ
        • Kreichati G
        • et al.
        Mechanical complications in adult spinal deformity and the effect of restoring the spinal shapes according to the Roussouly classification: a multicentric study.
        Eur Spine J. 2020; 29: 904-913https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-06253-1
        • Shau DN
        • Bible JE
        • Samade R
        • Gadomski SP
        • Mushtaq B
        • Wallace A
        • et al.
        Utility of postoperative radiographs for cervical spine fusion: a comprehensive evaluation of operative technique, surgical indication, and duration since surgery.
        Spine (Phila. Pa. 1976). 2012; 37: 994-2000https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31825c0130
        • Shau D N
        • Bible JE
        • Gadomski SP
        • Samade R
        • Armaghani S
        • Mencio GA
        • et al.
        Utility of postoperative radiographs for pediatric scoliosis: association between history and physical examination findings and radiographic findings.
        J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2014; 96: 1127-1134https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.L.01357
        • James MA
        • Seiler JG
        • Harrast JJ
        • Emery SE
        • Hurwitz S
        The occurrence of wrong-site surgery self-reported by candidates for certification by the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery.
        J Bone Jt Surg Ser A. 2012; 94: 1-12https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.K.00524
        • DeVine JG
        • Chutkan N
        • Gloystein D
        • Jackson K
        An update on wrong-site spine surgery.
        Glob Spine J. 2020; 10: 41S-44Shttps://doi.org/10.1177/2192568219846911
        • Groves ML
        • Zadnik PL
        • Kaloostian P
        • Sui J
        • Goodwin CR
        • Wolinsky JP
        • et al.
        Epidemiologic, functional, and oncologic outcome analysis of spinal sarcomas treated surgically at a single institution over 10 years.
        Spine J. 2015; 15: 110-114https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2014.07.005
        • Palumbo MA
        • Bianco AJ
        • Esmende S
        • Daniels AH
        Wrong-site spine surgery.
        J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2013; 21: 312-320
        • Kelly PD
        • Zuckerman SL
        • Yamada Y
        • Lis E
        • Bilsky MH
        • Laufer I
        • et al.
        Image guidance in spine tumor surgery.
        Neurosurg Rev. 2020; 43: 1007-1017
        • Madaelil TP
        • Long ÃJR
        • Wallace ÃAN
        • Baker ÃJC
        Preoperative fiducial marker placement in the Thoracic spine: a technical report.
        Spine (Phila PA 1976). 2017; 42 (:E624–8)https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001890