Advertisement

Cross-cultural French-Canadian adaptation and psychometric assessment of the Italian Spine Youth Quality of Life (ISYQOL) questionnaire

      Abstract

      BACKGROUND CONTEXT

      Idiopathic scoliosis (IS) can significantly alter the quality of life of adolescents. Some of the available questionnaires in French measuring the quality of life in this population show weak psychometric properties. The newly developed Italian Spine Youth Quality of Life (ISYQOL) questionnaire promises better properties.

      PURPOSE

      To provide a French-Canadian version of the ISYQOL and to verify its psychometric characteristics.

      STUDY DESIGN

      Prospective validation of a cross-cultural adaptation of the ISYQOL questionnaire.

      PATIENT SAMPLE

      A total of 111 participants with idiopathic scoliosis (77.5% female, 10–18 years old, mean Cobb angle=28°) were included in the study.

      OUTCOME MEASURE

      The French-Canadian version of the Italian Spine Youth Quality of Life (ISYQOL-F) questionnaire.

      MATERIALS AND METHODS

      The ISYQOL was translated into French using a forward-backward approach. We then verified the understanding of the translated items with two scoliosis experts and 10 adolescents. Afterward, 111 adolescents with IS were recruited by convenience at the scoliosis clinic and they completed the ISYQOL on three occasions (before seeing the specialist, 1 week, and 2 weeks after). Cronbach's alpha, intra-class (ICC), and Pearson correlation coefficients were used to respectively determine internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and concurrent validity with the SRS-22r and SF-12. The standard error of measurement (SEM) and 95% confidence minimal detectable change (MDC95) were also calculated. The ceiling effect was quantified as the percentage of participants who scored the maximum on ISYQOL-F.

      RESULTS

      The ISYQOL-F showed good internal consistency with a Cronbach alpha of 0.81 and 0.85 respectively for items 1–13 (n=55; ISYQOL-F mean score ± SD = 63.9±13.5) and 1–20 (n=56; ISYQOL-F mean score ± SD=60.7±10.3). Test-retest reliability was excellent (ICC3,1=0.94). The SEM is 3.1 and the MDC95 is 8.6. Correlations between ISYQOL-F and SRS-22r and between ISYQOL-F and SF-12 were moderate for total scores (r=0.56 and 0.50 respectively, p<.001), but low for each domain (between 0.20 and 0.48, p<.05). No significant ceiling effects were observed for ISYQOL-F (≤2.5%). In contrast, ceiling effects ranged from 3.6% to 30.6% for SRS-22r and 0%–68.5% for SF-12.

      CONCLUSIONS

      The internal consistency and reliability of ISYQOL-F are good. The total score correlates moderately with the SRS-22r and SF-12. Unlike SRS-22r, the ISYQOL-F does not appear to have a ceiling effect. The ISYQOL–F may thus be suitable to assess quality of life in a population of French-Canadian adolescents with IS.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The Spine Journal
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Konieczny MR
        • Senyurt H
        • Krauspe R.
        Epidemiology of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
        J Child Orthop. 2013; 7: 3-9
        • Charles YP
        • Daures JP
        • de Rosa V
        • Dimeglio A.
        Progression risk of idiopathic juvenile scoliosis during pubertal growth.
        Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006; 31: 1933-1942
        • Tan K-J
        • Moe MM
        • Vaithinathan R
        • Wong H-K.
        Curve progression in idiopathic scoliosis: follow-up study to skeletal maturity.
        Spine. 2009; 34: 697-700
        • Weinstein SL
        • Dolan LA
        • Cheng JC
        • Danielsson A
        • Morcuende JA.
        Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
        Lancet. 2008; 371: 1527-1537
        • Negrini S
        • Donzelli S
        • Aulisa AG
        • Czaprowski D
        • Schreiber S
        • de Mauroy JC
        • et al.
        2016 SOSORT guidelines: orthopaedic and rehabilitation treatment of idiopathic scoliosis during growth.
        Scoliosis Spinal Disord. 2018; 13: 3
        • Weinstein SL.
        The natural history of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
        J Pediatr Orthop. 2019; 39 (S44-S6)
        • Villamor GA
        • Andras LM
        • Yang J
        • Skaggs DL.
        Psychological effects of the SRS-22 on girls with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
        Spine Deform. 2018; 6: 699-703
        • Cheshire J
        • Gardner A
        • Berryman F
        • Pynsent P.
        Do the SRS-22 self-image and mental health domain scores reflect the degree of asymmetry of the back in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?.
        Scoliosis Spinal Disord. 2017; 12: 37
        • Diarbakerli E
        • Grauers A
        • Danielsson A
        • Abbott A
        • Gerdhem P.
        Quality of life in males and females with idiopathic scoliosis.
        Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019; 44: 404-410
        • Huo T
        • Guo Y
        • Shenkman E
        • Muller K.
        Assessing the reliability of the short form 12 (SF-12) health survey in adults with mental health conditions: a report from the wellness incentive and navigation (WIN) study.
        Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018; 16: 34
        • Luo X
        • George ML
        • Kakouras I
        • Edwards CL
        • Pietrobon R
        • Richardson W
        • et al.
        Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the short form 12-item survey (SF-12) in patients with back pain.
        Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003; 28: 1739-1745
      1. Caronni A, Donzelli S, Zaina F, Negrini S. The Italian Spine Youth Quality of Life questionnaire measures health-related quality of life of adolescents with spinal deformities better than the reference standard, the Scoliosis Research Society 22 questionnaire. Clin Rehabil 2019:269215519842246.

        • Beausejour M
        • Joncas J
        • Goulet L
        • Roy-Beaudry M
        • Parent S
        • Grimard G
        • et al.
        Reliability and validity of adapted French Canadian version of Scoliosis Research Society Outcomes Questionnaire (SRS-22) in Quebec.
        Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009; 34: 623-628
        • Cheung PWH
        • Wong CKH
        • Cheung JPY.
        An insight into the health-related quality of life of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients who are braced, observed, and previously braced.
        Spine. 2019; 44: E596-E605
        • Aulisa AG
        • Guzzanti V
        • Perisano C
        • Marzetti E
        • Specchia A
        • Galli M
        • et al.
        Determination of quality of life in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis subjected to conservative treatment.
        Scoliosis. 2010; 5: 21
        • Aghdasi B
        • Bachmann KR
        • Clark D
        • Koldenhoven R
        • Sultan M
        • George J
        • et al.
        Patient-reported outcomes following surgical intervention for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Clin Spine Surg. 2020; 33: 24-34
      2. Group TWJSs, medicine. The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): development and general psychometric properties. Soc Sci Med. 1998;46(12):1569-85.

        • Noerholm V
        • Grønvold M
        • Watt T
        • Bjorner J
        • Rasmussen N-A
        • Bech P.
        Quality of life in the Danish general population–normative data and validity of WHOQOL-BREF using Rasch and item response theory models.
        Qual Life Res. 2004; 13: 531-540
        • Lonjon G
        • Ilharreborde B
        • Odent T
        • Moreau S
        • Glorion C
        • Mazda K.
        Reliability and validity of the French-Canadian version of the scoliosis research society 22 questionnaire in France.
        Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014; 39: E26-E34
        • Asher MA
        • Lai SM
        • Glattes RC
        • Burton DC
        • Alanay A
        • Bago J.
        Refinement of the SRS-22 Health-Related Quality of Life questionnaire Function domain.
        Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006; 31: 593-597
        • Parent EC
        • Hill D
        • Mahood J
        • Moreau M
        • Raso J
        • Lou E.
        Discriminative and predictive validity of the scoliosis research society-22 questionnaire in management and curve-severity subgroups of adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis.
        Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009; 34: 2450-2457
        • Haher TR
        • Gorup JM
        • Shin TM
        • Homel P
        • Merola AA
        • Grogan DP
        • et al.
        Results of the Scoliosis Research Society instrument for evaluation of surgical outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A multicenter study of 244 patients.
        Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999; 24: 1435-1440
        • Caronni A
        • Sciume L
        • Donzelli S
        • Zaina F
        • Negrini S.
        ISYQOL: a Rasch-consistent questionnaire for measuring health-related quality of life in adolescents with spinal deformities.
        Spine J. 2017; 17: 1364-1372
        • Fallatah SM
        • Emam S
        • Al-Ghamdi G
        • Almatrafi F
        Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Italian Spine Youth Quality of Life (ISYQOL) questionnaire's Arabic version.
        Medicine. 2021; 100: e28063
        • Kinel E
        • Korbel K
        • Janusz P
        • Kozinoga M
        • Czaprowski D
        • Kotwicki T.
        Polish Adaptation of the Italian Spine Youth Quality of Life Questionnaire.
        J Clin Med. 2021; 10: 2081
        • Liu S
        • Liang J
        • Xu N
        • Mai S
        • Wang Q
        • Zeng L
        • et al.
        Reliability and validity of simplified Chinese version of the Italian spine youth quality of life questionnaire in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis.
        BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021; 22: 568
        • Sánchez-Raya J
        • D'Agata E
        • Donzelli S
        • Caronni A
        • Bagó J
        • Rigo M
        • et al.
        Spanish validation of Italian Spine Youth Quality of Life (ISYQOL) questionnaire.
        J Phys Med Rehabil. 2020; 2: 1-4
        • Parent EC
        • Dang R
        • Hill D
        • Mahood J
        • Moreau M
        • Raso J
        • et al.
        Score distribution of the scoliosis research society-22 questionnaire in subgroups of patients of all ages with idiopathic scoliosis.
        Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010; 35: 568-577
        • Alanazi MH
        • Parent EC
        • Bettany-Saltikov J
        • Hill D
        • Southon S.
        Convergent validity, ceiling, and floor effects of the English-ISYQOL against established quality of life questionnaires (SRS-22r and SAQ) and curve angles in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis.
        Stud Health Technol Inform. 2021; 280: 225-230
      3. Parent E, Lin A, Shearer K, Southon S, Donzelli S, Negrini S. Internal Consistency of the English Translation of the Italian Spine Youth Quality-of-Life Scale (ISYQOL) Compared to other Self-Image Questionnaires in Adolescents with Idiopathic Scoliosis. XIII International SOSORT Meeting; Dubrovnik 2018.

      4. Parent E, Lin A, Shearer K, Southon S, Donzelli S, Negrini S. Convergent validity of the English Translation of the ISYQOL scale in relation to other self-image questionnaires in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. XIII International SOSORT Meeting; Dubrovnik 2018.

        • Beaton DE
        • Bombardier C
        • Guillemin F
        • Ferraz MBJS.
        Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures.
        Spine. 2000; 25: 3186-3191
        • Sharon Wood D
        • Gauthier L
        • Gandek B
        • Magnan L
        • Pierre U
        Readying a US measure of health status, the SF-36, for use in Canada.
        Clin Invest Med. 1997; 20: 224-238
        • Costello AB
        • Osborne J.
        Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis.
        Pract Assess Res Evaluat. 2005; 10: 1-9
        • Arsham H.
        Sample size determination [Internet].
        University of Baltimore, Baltimore1996 (Available from) (Accessed May 2019)
        • Shoukri MM
        • Asyali MH
        • Donner A.
        Sample size requirements for the design of reliability study: review and new results.
        Stat Methods Med Res. 2004; 13: 251-271
        • Walter SD
        • Eliasziw M
        • Donner A.
        Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies.
        Stat Med. 1998; 17: 101-110
      5. Parent E, Lin A, Shearer K, Southon S, Donzelli S, Negrini S. The encounter with the specialist affects the test-retest reliability of self-image quality of life questionnaires in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. Congrès de l'Association canadienne de physiothérapie; Montréal 2018.

        • Musselwhite Thompson D
        • Wesolowski B.
        The SAGE encyclopedia of educational research, measurement, and evaluation.
        Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, USA2018
        • Fortin C
        • Feldman DE
        • Cheriet F
        • Gravel D
        • Gauthier F
        • Labelle H.
        Reliability of a quantitative clinical posture assessment tool among persons with idiopathic scoliosis.
        Physiotherapy. 2012; 98: 64-75
      6. Mokkink LB, Prinsen C, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Bouter LM, De Vet H, et al. COSMIN methodology for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs); user manual. 2018. Retrieved 2022 from: https://www.cosmin.nl.

        • Polit DF.
        Getting serious about test-retest reliability: a critique of retest research and some recommendations.
        Qual Life Res. 2014; 23: 1713-1720
        • de Vet HC
        • Terwee CB.
        The minimal detectable change should not replace the minimal important difference.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2010; 63 (author reply 6): 804-805
        • Bagó J
        • Pérez-Grueso FJ
        • Les E
        • Hernández P
        • Pellisé FJESJ
        Minimal important differences of the SRS-22 Patient Questionnaire following surgical treatment of idiopathic scoliosis.
        Eur Spine J. 2009; 18: 1898-1904
        • Haher TR
        • Gorup JM
        • Shin TM
        • Homel P
        • Merola AA
        • Grogan DP
        • et al.
        Results of the scoliosis research society instrument for evaluation of surgical outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a multicenter study of 244 patients.
        Spine. 1999; 24: 1435
        • Ware Jr., J
        • Kosinski M
        • Keller SD
        A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity.
        Med Care. 1996; 34: 220-233
        • Tawiah A
        • Al Sayah F
        • Ohinmaa A
        • Johnson J
        Discriminative validity of the EQ-5D-5 L and SF-12 in older adults with arthritis.
        Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019; 17: 68
        • Anthoine E
        • Moret L
        • Regnault A
        • Sebille V
        • Hardouin JB.
        Sample size used to validate a scale: a review of publications on newly-developed patient reported outcomes measures.
        Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014; 12: 176
      7. Mokkink LB, Prinsen CA, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Bouter LM, de Vet HC, et al. COSMIN Study Design checklist for Patient-reported outcome measurement instruments. 2019. Retrieved 2022 from https://www.cosmin.nl.

        • Szende A
        • Janssen B
        • Cabases J.
        Self-reported population health: an international perspective based on EQ-5D.
        Springer, 2014