Advertisement
Outstanding Paper| Volume 23, ISSUE 1, P6-13, January 2023

Download started.

Ok

Perioperative analgesic efficacy and safety of erector spinae plane block in posterior cervical spine surgery—a double blinded, randomized controlled study

      Abstract

      Background content

      Posterior cervical spine surgery (PCSS) are typically open surgeries and entail significant postoperative pain. Current perioperative pain management in PCSS is reliant on multimodal analgesia. While perioperative epidural anesthetic infusion can be used in lumbar surgeries, this is not an option in the cervical spine. Pre-emptive regional analgesia through erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has shown significant perioperative analgesic benefits in lumbar spine surgeries. There are no such clinical studies in PCSS.

      Purpose

      To assess the safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided ESPB for perioperative analgesia in PCSS.

      Study design

      Prospective, randomized controlled, double-blinded study.

      Patient sample

      Eighty-six patients requiring sub-axial PCSS with or without instrumentation were randomized into two groups, those who underwent ESPB with multimodal analgesia (case) and those with only multimodal analgesia (control).

      Outcome measures

      Demographic and surgical data (blood loss, duration of surgery, perioperative total opioid consumption, muscle relaxants used) were assessed. Postoperatively, the surgical site pain, alertness scale, satisfaction score, time to mobilization and complications were recorded.

      Methods

      After anesthesia and prone position, case patients received ultrasound-guided ESPB at the T1 level using 15 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine and 8 mg Dexamethasone bilaterally while the control patients received only standard postoperative multimodal analgesia.

      Results

      There were 43 patients in each group; the two groups were identical in demographic and surgical profile. The intraoperative opioid consumption (119.53±40.35 vs. 308.6±189.78; p<.001) in mcg), muscle relaxant usage (50.00±0.00 mg vs. 59.53±3.75 mg, p<.001), surgical duration (124.77±26.63/ 156.74±37.01 min; p<.01) and intraoperative blood loss (310.47±130.73 ml vs. 429.77±148.50 ml; p<.05) were significantly less in the ESPB group. In the postoperative period, the control group's pain score was significantly higher (p<.001). The Modified Observer Alertness/Sedation Score (MOASS) score and satisfaction scores also showed significant differences between the case and control groups (p<.001). The mean time required to ambulate (sitting/walking) was statistically less in cases (15.81±6.15/20.72±4.02 h) when compared to controls (16.86±6.18/ 23.05±8.88 h; p<.001).

      Conclusion

      In patients undergoing PCSS, ESPB is a safe and effective technique with better outcomes than standard multimodal analgesia alone, in terms of reduced intraoperative opioid requirements and blood loss, better postoperative analgesia and early mobilization.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The Spine Journal
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Epstein N.E.
        Laminectomy for cervical myelopathy.
        Spinal Cord. 2003; 41: 317-327https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3101477
        • Kire N.
        • Jain S.
        • Merchant Z.A.
        • Kundnani V.
        The efficacy of posterior cervical laminectomy for multilevel degenerative cervical spondylotic myelopathy in long term period.
        Asian J Neurosurg. 2019; 14: 848-852https://doi.org/10.4103/ajns.AJNS_49_19
        • Gerbershagen H.J.
        • Aduckathil S.
        • van Wijck A.J.M.
        • Peelen L.M.
        • Kalkman C.J.
        • Meissner W.
        Pain intensity on the first day after surgery: a prospective cohort study comparing 179 surgical procedures.
        Anesthesiology. 2013; 118: 934-944https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e31828866b3
        • Loftus R.W.
        • Yeager M.P.
        • Clark J.A.
        • Brown J.R.
        • Abdu W.A.
        • Sengupta D.K.
        • et al.
        Intraoperative ketamine reduces perioperative opiate consumption in opiate-dependent patients with chronic back pain undergoing back surgery.
        Anesthesiology. 2010; 113: 639-646https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181e90914
        • Cata J.P.
        • Noguera E.M.
        • Parke E.
        • Ebrahim Z.
        • Kurz A.
        • Kalfas I.
        • et al.
        Patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) for postoperative pain control after lumbar spine surgery.
        J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2008; 20: 256-260https://doi.org/10.1097/ANA.0b013e31817ffe90
        • Mei W.J.
        • Fei L.H.
        • Yan J.H.
        Acute post surgical pain may result in chronic post surgical pain: a systemic review and meta analysis.
        Pak J Med Sci. 2015; 31: 833-836https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.314.7555
        • Jin F.
        • Chung F.
        Multimodal analgesia for postoperative pain control.
        J Clin Anesth. 2001; 13: 524-539https://doi.org/10.1016/s0952-8180(01)00320-8
        • Chin K.J.
        • Lewis S.
        Opioid-free analgesia for posterior spinal fusion surgery using erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks in a multimodal anesthetic regimen.
        Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019; 44: E379-E383https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002855
        • Rodgers A.
        • Walker N.
        • Schug S.
        • McKee A.
        • Kehlet H.
        • van Zundert A.
        • et al.
        Reduction of postoperative mortality and morbidity with epidural or spinal anesthesia: results from overview of randomised trials.
        BMJ. 2000; 321: 1493https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.321.7275.1493
        • Bujedo B.M.
        • Santos S.G.
        • Azpiazu A.U.
        A review of epidural and intrathecal opioids used in the management of postoperative pain.
        J Opioid Manag. 2012; 8: 177-192https://doi.org/10.5055/jom.2012.0114
        • El-Baz N.M.
        • Faber L.P.
        • Jensik RJ.
        Continuous epidural infusion of morphine for treatment of pain after thoracic surgery: a new technique.
        Anesth Analg. 1984; 63: 757-764
        • Tulgar S.
        • Ahiskalioglu A.
        • De Cassai A.
        • Gurkan Y.
        Efficacy of bilateral erector spinae plane block in the management of pain: current insights.
        J Pain Res. 2019; 12: 2597-2613https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S182128
        • Goel V.K.
        • Chandramohan M.
        • Murugan C.
        • Shetty A.P.
        • Subramanian B.
        • Kanna R.M.
        • et al.
        Clinical efficacy of ultrasound guided bilateral erector spinae block for single-level lumbar fusion surgery: a prospective, randomized, case-control study.
        Spine J. 2021; 21: 1873-1880https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2021.06.015
        • Diwan S.
        • Koh W.U.
        • Chin K.J.
        • Nair A.
        Bilateral high thoracic continuous erector spinae plane blocks for postoperative analgesia in a posterior cervical fusion.
        Saudi J Anaesth. 2020; 14: 535-537https://doi.org/10.4103/sja.SJA_642_19
        • Ohgoshi Y.
        • Izawa H.
        • Kori S.
        • Matsukawa M.
        Multifidus cervicis plane block is effective for cervical spine surgery.
        Can J Anaesth. 2017; 64: 329-330https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-016-0767-y
        • Ohgoshi Y.
        • Kurahashi K.
        Cervical interfascial plane (CIP) block and multifidus cervicis plane (MCP) block: similarities and tips.
        J Clin Anesth. 2017; 41: 55https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2017.06.014
        • Šámal F.
        • Linzer P.
        • Filip M.
        • Jurek P.
        • Pohlodek D.
        • Haninec P.
        Minimally invasive posterior lumbar interbody fusion and instrumentation - outcomes at 24-month follow-up.
        Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2020; 87: 95-100
        • Hur J.W.
        • Kim J.S.
        • Shin M.H.
        • Ryu K.S.
        Minimally invasive posterior cervical decompression using tubular retractor: the technical note and early clinical outcome.
        Surg Neurol Int. 2014; 5: 34https://doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.128915
        • Fujimura Y.
        • Nishi Y.
        Atrophy of the nuchal muscle and change in cervical curvature after expansive open-door laminoplasty.
        Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1996; 115: 203-205https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00434554
        • Gottschalk A.
        • Durieux M.E.
        • Nemergut EC.
        Intraoperative methadone improves postoperative pain control in patients undergoing complex spine surgery.
        Anesth Analg. 2011; 112: 218-223https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181d8a095
        • Fisher C.G.
        • Belanger L.
        • Gofton E.G.
        • Umedaly H.S.
        • Noonan V.K.
        • Abramson C.
        • et al.
        Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with patient-controlled epidural analgesia after lumbar spinal fusion.
        Spine. 2003; 28 (Phila Pa 1976): 739-743
        • Elder J.B.
        • Hoh D.J.
        • Liu C.Y.
        • Wang MY.
        Postoperative continuous paravertebral anesthetic infusion for pain control in posterior cervical spine surgery: a case-control study.
        Neurosurgery. 2010; 66 (discussion 106-107): 99-106https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000349208.87863.B3
        • Hida T.
        • Yukawa Y.
        • Ito K.
        • Machino M.
        • Imagama S.
        • Ishiguro N.
        • et al.
        Intrathecal morphine for postoperative pain control after laminoplasty in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
        J Orthop Sci. 2016; 21: 425-430https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2016. 03.004
        • Tseng V.
        • Cole C.
        • Schmidt M.H.
        • Abramowicz A.E.
        • Xu J.L.
        Analgesic efficacy of paraspinal interfascial plane blocks performed with the use of neurophysiology monitoring for posterior cervical laminectomy surgery: a case series.
        J Spine Surg. 2021; 7: 109-113https://doi.org/10.21037/jss-20-644
        • Chin K.
        • Adhikary S.
        • Forero M.
        Erector spinae plane (ESP) block: a new paradigm in regional anesthesia and analgesia.
        Curr Anesthesiol Rep. 2019; 9https://doi.org/10.1007/s40140-019-00333-0
        • Forero M.
        • Rajarathinam M.
        • Adhikary S.D.
        • Chin K.J.
        Erector spinae plane block for the management of chronic shoulder pain: a case report.
        Can J Anaesth. 2018; 65: 288-293https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-017-1010-1
        • Elsharkawy H.
        • Ince I.
        • Hamadnalla H.
        • Drake R.L.
        • Tsui B.C.H.
        Cervical erector spinae plane block: a cadaver study.
        Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2020; 45: 552-556https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2019-101154
        • Diwan S.M.
        • Yamak Altinpulluk E.
        • Khurjekar K.
        • Nair A.
        • Dongre H.
        • Turan A.
        Bilateral erector spinae plane block for scoliosis surgery: case series.
        Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim (Engl Ed). 2020; 67: 153-158https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redar.2019.11.012
        • Kong M.
        • Li X.
        • Shen J.
        • Ye M.
        • Xiang H.
        • Ma D.
        The effectiveness of preemptive analgesia for relieving postoperative pain after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS): a prospective, non-randomized controlled trial.
        J Thorac Dis. 2020; 12: 4930-4940https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-2500
        • Forero M.
        • Adhikary S.D.
        • Lopez H.
        • Tsui C.
        • Chin K.J.
        The erector spinae plane block: a novel analgesic technique in thoracic neuropathic pain.
        Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016; 41: 621-627https://doi.org/10.1097/AAP.0000000000000451
        • Vieira P.A.
        • Pulai I.
        • Tsao G.C.
        • Manikantan P.
        • Keller B.
        • Connelly N.R.
        Dexamethasone with bupivacaine increases duration of analgesia in ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus blockade.
        Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010; 27: 285-288https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0b013 e3283350c38