Advertisement
Systematic Review / Meta-Analysis| Volume 21, ISSUE 11, P1802-1811, November 2021

Download started.

Ok

Risk factors for postoperative urinary retention following elective spine surgery: a meta-analysis

  • Author Footnotes
    1 These authors contributed equally to this study.
    Yu Chang
    Footnotes
    1 These authors contributed equally to this study.
    Affiliations
    Section of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    1 These authors contributed equally to this study.
    Kuan-Yu Chi
    Footnotes
    1 These authors contributed equally to this study.
    Affiliations
    Department of Internal Medicine, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
    Search for articles by this author
  • Ta-Wei Tai
    Affiliations
    Department of Orthopedics, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
    Search for articles by this author
  • Yu-Sheng Cheng
    Affiliations
    Department of Urology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
    Search for articles by this author
  • Po-Hsuan Lee
    Affiliations
    Section of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
    Search for articles by this author
  • Chi-Chen Huang
    Affiliations
    Section of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
    Search for articles by this author
  • Jung-Shun Lee
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author. Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Attending Doctor, Department of Neurosurgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan. Tel.: 886-6-2352535, Ext 5181
    Affiliations
    Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan

    Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    1 These authors contributed equally to this study.

      Abstract

      BACKGROUND CONTEXT

      Limited studies have investigated risk factors for postoperative urinary retention (POUR) following elective spine surgery. Furthermore, some discrepancies have been found in the results of existing observational studies.

      PURPOSE

      This study aimed to review the available literature on risk factors associated with POUR following elective spine surgery.

      STUDY DESIGN

      A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed.

      PATIENT SAMPLE

      A total of 31,251 patients (POUR=2,858, no POUR=28,393) were included in the meta-analysis.

      OUTCOME MEASURES

      Demographics, type of elective spine surgery, country, definition of POUR, and potential risk factors for POUR were evaluated.

      METHODS

      The Cochrane Library, Embase, and Medline electronic databases were searched to identify relevant studies. Binary outcomes were reported as odds ratio (OR). Weighted mean differences (WMD) or standardized mean differences (SMD), with 95% confidence intervals (CI), were used for meta-analysis of continuous outcomes.

      RESULTS

      Eleven studies (2 prospective and 9 retrospective) were included in the analysis. Patients with POUR were older than those without POUR (WMD, 7.13; 95% CI, 4.50–9.76). Male patients were found to have an increased risk of POUR (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.04–1.64). The following variables were also identified as significant risk factors for POUR: benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH; OR, 3.79; 95% CI, 1.89–7.62), diabetes mellitus (DM; OR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.17–1.93), and previous urinary tract infection (UTI; OR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.28–2.24). Moreover, longer operative time (WMD, 19.88; 95% CI, 5.01–34.75) and increased intraoperative fluid support (SMD, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.23–0.52) were observed in patients with POUR. In contrast, spine surgical procedures involving fewer levels (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.65–0.86), and ambulation on the same day as surgery (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.52–0.81) were associated with a decreased risk of POUR.

      CONCLUSIONS

      Based on our meta-analysis, older age, male gender, BPH, DM, and a history of UTI are risk factors for POUR following elective spine surgery. We also found that longer operative time and increased intravenous fluid support would increase the risk of POUR. Additionally, multi-level spine surgery may have a negative effect on postoperative voiding.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The Spine Journal
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Darrah DM
        • Griebling TL
        • Silverstein JH
        Postoperative urinary retention.
        Anesthesiol Clin. 2009; 27: 465-484https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anclin.2009.07.010
        • Grotle M
        • Småstuen MC
        • Fjeld O
        • Grøvle L
        • Helgeland J
        • Storheim K
        • et al.
        Lumbar spine surgery across 15 years: trends, complications and reoperations in a longitudinal observational study from Norway.
        BMJ Open. 2019; 9e028743https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028743
        • Oglesby M
        • Fineberg SJ
        • Patel AA
        • Pelton MA
        • Singh K
        Epidemiological trends in cervical spine surgery for degenerative diseases between 2002 and 2009.
        Spine. 2013; 38: 1226-1232https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a79618
        • Aiyer SN
        • Kumar A
        • Shetty AP
        • Kanna RM
        • Rajasekaran S
        Factors influencing postoperative urinary retention following elective posterior lumbar spine surgery: a prospective study.
        Asian Spine J. 2018; 12: 1100-1105https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2018.12.6.1100
        • Altschul D
        • Kobets A
        • Nakhla J
        • Jada A
        • Nasser R
        • Kinon MD
        • et al.
        Postoperative urinary retention in patients undergoing elective spinal surgery.
        J Neurosurg Spine. 2017; 26: 229-234https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.8.SPINE151371
        • Boulis NM
        • Mian FS
        • Rodriguez D
        • Cho E
        • Hoff JT
        Urinary retention following routine neurosurgical spine procedures.
        Surg Neurol. 2001; 5: 23-27https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-3019(01)00331-7
      1. Gandhi SD, Patel SA, Maltenfort M, Anderson DG, Vaccaro AR, Albert TJ, et al. Patient and surgical factors associated with postoperative urinary retention after lumbar spine surgery. Spine. 2014;39(22):1905-9. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000572

        • Lee S
        • Kim CH
        • Chung CK
        • Park SB
        • Yang SH
        • Kim SH
        • et al.
        Risk factor analysis for postoperative urinary retention after surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
        Spine J. 2017; 17: 469-477https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2016.03.017
        • Cremins M
        • Vellanky S
        • McCann G
        • Mancini M
        • Sanzari L
        • Yannopoulos A
        Considering healthcare value and associated risk factors with postoperative urinary retention after elective laminectomy.
        Spine J. 2020; 20: 701-707https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2020.01.012
        • Zorrilla-Vaca A
        • Healy RJ
        • Mirski MA
        A Comparison of regional versus general anesthesia for lumbar spine surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized studies.
        J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2017; 29: 415-425https://doi.org/10.1097/ANA.0000000000000362
        • Golubovsky JL
        • Ilyas H
        • Chen J
        • Tanenbaum JE
        • Mroz TE
        • Steinmetz MP
        Risk factors and associated complications for postoperative urinary retention after lumbar surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.
        Spine J. 2018; 18: 1533-1539https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2018.01.022
        • Jung HJ
        • Park JB
        • Kong CG
        • Kim YY
        • Park J
        • Kim JB
        Postoperative urinary retention following anterior cervical spine surgery for degenerative cervical disc diseases.
        Clin Orthop Surg. 2013; 5: 134-137https://doi.org/10.4055/cios.2013.5.2.134
        • Zakaria HM
        • Lipphardt M
        • Bazydlo M
        • Xiao S
        • Schultz L
        • Chedid M
        • et al.
        The preoperative risks and two-year sequelae of postoperative urinary retention: analysis of the michigan spine surgery improvement collaborative (MSSIC).
        World Neurosurg. 2020; 133: e619-e626https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.09.107
        • Strickland AR
        • Usmani MF
        • Camacho JE
        • Sahai A
        • Bruckner JJ
        • Buraimoh K
        • et al.
        Evaluation of risk factors for postoperative urinary retention in elective thoracolumbar spinal fusion patients.
        Global Spine J. 2021; 11: 338-344https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568220904681
        • Higgins JPTTJ
        • Chandler J
        • Cumpston M
        • Li T
        • Page MJ
        • Welch VA
        Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 6.0 (updated July 2019).
        (editors)2019 (CochraneAvailable from)
      2. National Heart L, and Blood Institute. Quality assessment tool for case-controlled studies. https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health.

        • Viechtbauer W
        Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor Package.
        J Stat Softw. 2010; 36https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v036.i03
        • Hozo SP
        • Djulbegovic B
        • Hozo I
        Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample.
        BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005; 5: 13https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-5-13
        • Harville DA
        Maximum likelihood approaches to variance component estimation and to related problems.
        J Am Stat Assoc. 1977; 72: 320-338https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1977.10480998
        • Higgins JP
        • Thompson SG
        • Deeks JJ
        • Altman DG
        Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses.
        BMJ. 2003; 327: 557-560https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
        • Mormol JD
        • Basques BA
        • Harada GK
        • Louie PK
        • Alter K
        • Goldberg E
        • et al.
        Risk factors associated with development of urinary retention following posterior lumbar spinal fusion: special attention to the use of glycopyrrolate in anesthesia reversal.
        Spine. 2021; 46: E133-E138https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000003678
        • Lee KS
        • Lim KH
        • Kim SJ
        • Choi HJ
        • Noh DH
        • Lee HW
        • et al.
        Predictors of successful trial without catheter for postoperative urinary retention following non-urological surgery.
        Int Neurourol J. 2011; 15: 158-165https://doi.org/10.5213/inj.2011.15.3.158
        • Tammela T
        • Kontturi M
        • Lukkarinen O
        Postoperative urinary retention. I. Incidence and predisposing factors.
        Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1986; 20: 197-201https://doi.org/10.3109/00365598609024494
        • Verhamme KM
        • Dieleman JP
        • Bleumink GS
        • van der Lei J
        • Sturkenboom MC
        • Artibani W
        • et al.
        Incidence and prevalence of lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia in primary care–the Triumph project.
        Eur Urol. 2002; 42: 323-328https://doi.org/10.1016/s0302-2838(02)00354-8
        • Liu G
        • Daneshgari F
        Diabetic bladder dysfunction.
        Chin Med J. 2014; 127: 1357-1364https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.20132407
        • Zhang K
        • Xu Z
        • Zhang J
        • Wang H
        • Zhang D
        • Shi B
        Clinical significance of urodynamic analysis in patients with benign prostatic enlargement complicated with diabetes mellitus.
        Urol Int. 2008; 81: 149-152https://doi.org/10.1159/000144052
        • Daneshgari F
        • Moore C
        Diabetic uropathy.
        Semin Nephrol. 2006; 26: 182-185https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semnephrol.2005.09.009
        • Jin SJ
        • Park YS
        • Kim SH
        • Kim D
        • Shim WH
        • Jang DM
        • et al.
        Effect of prone positional apparatus on the occurrence of acute kidney injury after spine surgery.
        World Neurosurg. 2019; 128: e597-e602https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.04.216
        • Park CK
        The effect of patient positioning on intraabdominal pressure and blood loss in spinal surgery.
        Anesth Analg. 2000; 91: 552-557https://doi.org/10.1097/00000539-200009000-00009
        • Schonauer C
        • Bocchetti A
        • Barbagallo G
        • Albanese V
        • Moraci A
        Positioning on surgical table.
        Eur Spine J. 2004; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-004-0728-y
        • Yokoyama M
        • Ueda W
        • Hirakawa M
        • Yamamoto H
        Hemodynamic effect of the prone position during anesthesia.
        Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1991; 35: 741-744https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.1991.tb03382.x
        • Saugel B
        • Kouz K
        • Scheeren TWL
        The '5 Ts' of perioperative goal-directed haemodynamic therapy.
        Br J Anaesth. 2019; 123: 103-107https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2019.04.048
      3. Dharmavaram S, Jellish WS, Nockels RP, Shea J, Mehmood R, Ghanayem A, et al. Effect of prone positioning systems on hemodynamic and cardiac function during lumbar spine surgery: an echocardiographic study. Spine. 2006;31(12):1388-93. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000218485.96713

        • Panicker JN
        • Fowler CJ
        • Kessler TM
        Lower urinary tract dysfunction in the neurological patient: clinical assessment and management.
        Lancet Neurol. 2015; 14: 720-732https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00070-8
        • Madersbacher H
        • Cardozo L
        • Chapple C
        • Abrams P
        • Toozs-Hobson P
        • Young JS
        • et al.
        What are the causes and consequences of bladder overdistension? ICI-RS 2011.
        Neurourol Urodyn. 2012; 31: 317-321https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.22224
        • Lawrie CM
        • Ong AC
        • Hernandez VH
        • Rosas S
        • Post ZD
        • Orozco FR
        Incidence and risk factors for postoperative urinary retention in total hip arthroplasty performed under spinal anesthesia.
        J Arthroplasty. 2017; 32: 3748-3751https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.07.009
        • Petros JG
        • Rimm EB
        • Robillard RJ
        Factors influencing urinary tract retention after elective open cholecystectomy.
        Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1992; 174: 497-500
        • Choi S
        • Mahon P
        • Awad IT
        Neuraxial anesthesia and bladder dysfunction in the perioperative period: a systematic review.
        Can J Anaesth. 2012; 59: 681-703https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-012-9717-5
      4. Mayo BC, Louie PK, Bohl DD, Massel DH, Iantorno SE, Ahn J, et al. Effects of intraoperative anesthetic medications on postoperative urinary retention after single-level lumbar fusion. Spine. 2016;41(18):1441-6. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000001554.

        • Ongaigui C
        • Fiorda-Diaz J
        • Dada O
        • Mavarez-Martinez A
        • Echeverria-Villalobos M
        • Bergese SD
        Intraoperative fluid management in patients undergoing spine surgery: a narrative review.
        Front Surg. 2020; 7: 45https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2020.00045
        • Boitano LT
        • DeBono M
        • Tanious A
        • Iannuzzi JC
        • Clouse WD
        • Eagleton MJ
        • et al.
        Incidence of and risk factors for postoperative urinary retention in men after carotid endarterectomy.
        J Vasc Surg. 2020; 72: 943-950https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2019.10.093
        • Iorio R
        • Whang W
        • Healy WL
        • Patch DA
        • Najibi S
        • Appleby D
        The utility of bladder catheterization in total hip arthroplasty.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005; 432: 148-152https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000149823.57513.00
        • Iorio R
        • Healy WL
        • Patch DA
        • Appleby D
        The role of bladder catheterization in total knee arthroplasty.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000; 380: 80-84https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200011000-00011
        • Hansen AB
        • Olsen KS
        The number of in-out catheterisations is reduced by mobilising the postoperative patient with bladder needs to the toilet in the recovery room: A randomised clinical trial.
        Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015; 32: 486-492https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000000214
        • Ljungqvist O
        • Scott M
        • Fearon KC
        Enhanced recovery after surgery: a review.
        JAMA Surg. 2017; 152: 292-298https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4952