Thoracic costotransversectomies (TCT) are amongst the most invasive spine procedures performed. Of greatest concern to the patient and surgeon is the risk of iatrogenic neurologic injury associated with these procedures. Most available studies limit their assessment of neurologic function to nonspecific scales such as the broader ASIA scoring system of A to E and have not comprehensively described the rates of iatrogenic injury following these procedures by looking more precisely with ASIA motor scoring (0–100) which allows for more in-depth analysis.
The purpose of this study is to investigate the rates and degree of iatrogenic neurologic decline following TCT and subsequent rates and degree of motor recovery.
Retrospective medical record review at a single institution.
Around 116 consecutive patients undergoing TCT operations.
Neurological changes from preprocedure to final follow-up assessed by lower extremity motor score.
A retrospective chart review of patients undergoing TCT between May 2008 and April 2018 was carried out. Clinical, surgical, and intraoperative neuromonitoring data were collected. Patients who demonstrated an initial postoperative decline in lower extremity motor scores (LEMS) were followed through their final follow up to assess recovery.
Around 116 patients underwent TCT between T2 and T12 between May 2008 and April 2018. Seven (6.0%) patients demonstrated an immediate postoperative decline as defined by a drop of more than 4 points (mean 15.1; range 5–50) in motor score. All patients who demonstrated an initial postoperative motor score decline returned to within 4 LEMS points of their preoperative LEMS by final follow up. IOMN changes were noted only in half of all monitored patients who were noted to have a decline.
In our series, 6.0% of patients undergoing TCT experienced an initial decline in motor score with 94.0% demonstrating an unchanged or improved examination compared to preoperative exam. In our series, all patients who exhibited a decline recovered to within 4 points of the preoperative motor score within the first year postoperatively.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:Subscribe to The Spine Journal
Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
- Towards standardized measurement of adverse events in spine surgery: conceptual model and pilot evaluation.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006; 7: 53
- Using the spine surgical invasiveness index to identify risk of surgical site infection: a multivariate analysis.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012; 94: 335-342
- Extended costotransversectomy to achieve circumferential fusion for pathologies causing thoracic instability.Spine J. 2014; 14: 2094-2101
- Perioperative characteristics, complications, and outcomes of single-level versus multilevel thoracic corpectomies via modified costotransversectomy approach.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013; 38: 523-530
- Lateral extracavitary vs. costotransversectomy approaches to the thoracic spine: reflections on lessons learned.Neurosurgery. 2012; 71: 1096-1102
- Lateral extracavitary, costotransversectomy, and transthoracic thoracotomy approaches to the thoracic spine: review of techniques and complications.J Spinal Disord Tech. 2013; 26: 222-232
- Outcomes of posterior thoracic corpectomies for metastatic spine tumors: an analysis of 90 patients.World Neurosurg. 2019; 123: e371-e3e8
- Charcot spine treated using a single staged posterolateral costotransversectomy approach in a patient with traumatic spinal cord injury.J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2013; 54: 532-536
- One-stage posterior approaches for treatment of thoracic spinal infection: Transforaminal and costotransversectomy, compared with anterior approach with posterior instrumentation.Medicine (Baltimore). 2017; 96: e8352
- Perioperative complications with costotransversectomy and anterior approaches to thoracic and thoracolumbar tumors.Neurosurg Focus. 2001; 11: e4
- The transpedicular approach compared with the anterior approach: an analysis of 80 thoracolumbar corpectomies.J Neurosurg Spine. 2010; 12: 583-591
- Single-stage posterior corpectomy and expandable cage placement for treatment of thoracic or lumbar burst fractures.Spine (Phila Pa 1976. 2009; 34: E33-E40
- Posterior approach for thoracolumbar corpectomies with expandable cage placement and circumferential arthrodesis: a multicenter case series of 67 patients.J Neurosurg Spine. 2011; 14: 388-397
- The posterior transpedicular approach for circumferential decompression and instrumented stabilization with titanium cage vertebrectomy reconstruction for spinal tumors: consecutive case series of 50 patients.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012; 37: 1375-1383
- Single-stage posterior vertebrectomy and replacement combined with posterior instrumentation for spinal metastasis.J Neurosurg. 1996; 85: 211-220
- Reference for the 2011 revision of the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury.J Spinal Cord Med. 2011; 34: 547-554
- Metric properties of the ASIA motor score: subscales improve correlation with functional activities.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004; 85: 1804-1810
- Inter-rater reliability of motor and sensory examinations performed according to American Spinal Injury Association standards.Spinal Cord. 2007; 45: 444-451
- Anterior transthoracic surgery with motor evoked potential monitoring for high-risk thoracic disc herniations: technique and results.World Neurosurg. 2017; 105: 441-455
- Intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring to patients with preoperative spinal deficits: judging its feasibility and analyzing the significance of rapid signal loss.Spine J. 2017; 17: 777-783
- Assessment of impairment in patients with acute traumatic spinal cord injury: a systematic review of the literature.J Neurotrauma. 2011; 28: 1445-1477
Published online: January 12, 2021
Accepted: January 11, 2021
Received in revised form: December 21, 2020
Received: October 9, 2020
FDA device/drug status: Not applicable.
Author disclosures: ANEN: Nothing to disclose. CT: Nothing to disclose. JA: Nothing to disclose. HZ: Nothing to disclose. CB: Nothing to disclose. RJB: Speaking and/or Teaching Arrangements: Globus (C), AO Spine (B); Fellowship Support: AO Spine (E).
© 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.