Advertisement

Retrolisthesis and lumbar disc herniation: a preoperative assessment of patient function

Published:January 02, 2007DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2006.08.011

      Abstract

      Background context

      Retrolisthesis is relatively rare but when present has been associated with increased back pain and impaired back function. Neither the prevalence of this condition in individuals with lumbar disc herniations nor its possible relation to preoperative back pain and dysfunction has been well studied.

      Purpose

      The purposes of this study were as follows: (1) to determine the prevalence of retrolisthesis (alone or in combination with other degenerative conditions) in individuals with confirmed L5–S1 disc herniation who later underwent lumbar discectomy; (2) to determine if there is any association between retrolisthesis and degenerative changes within the same vertebral motion segment; and (3) to determine the relation between retrolisthesis (alone or in combination with other degenerative conditions) and preoperative low back pain, physical function, and quality of life.

      Study design/setting

      Cross-sectional study.

      Patient sample

      A total of 125 individuals were identified for incorporation into this study. All patients had confirmed L5–S1 disc herniation on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and later underwent L5–S1 discectomy. All patients were enrolled in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) study; data were obtained from the multi-institutional database comprised of SPORT patients from across the United States.

      Outcome measures

      Retrolisthesis, degenerative change on MRI, and Modic changes.

      Methods

      MRI scans of the lumbar spine were assessed at spinal level L5–S1 for all 125 patients. Retrolisthesis was defined as posterior subluxation of 8% or more. Disc degeneration was defined as any loss of disc signal on T2 imaging. Modic changes were graded 1 to 3 and collectively classified as vertebral endplate degenerative changes. The presence of facet arthropathy and ligamentum flavum hypertrophy was classified jointly as posterior degenerative changes.

      Results

      The overall incidence of retrolisthesis at L5–S1 in our study was 23.2%. Retrolisthesis combined with posterior degenerative changes, degenerative disc disease, or vertebral endplate changes had incidences of 4.8%, 16%, and 4.8% respectively. The prevalence of retrolisthesis did not vary by sex, age, race, smoking status, or education level when compared with individuals with normal sagittal alignment. However, individuals with retrolisthesis were more likely to be receiving workers' compensation than those without retrolisthesis. Increased age was found to be associated with individuals having vertebral endplate degenerative changes (both alone and in conjunction with retrolisthesis) and degenerative disc disease. Individuals who had retrolisthesis with concomitant vertebral endplate degenerative changes were more often smokers and had no insurance. The presence of retrolisthesis was not associated with an increased incidence of having degenerative disc disease, posterior degenerative changes, or vertebral endplate changes. No statistical significance was found between the presence of retrolisthesis on the degree of patient preoperative low back pain and physical function. Patients with degenerative disc disease were found to have increased leg pain compared with those patients without degenerative disc changes.

      Conclusions

      We found no significant relationship between retrolisthesis in patients with L5–S1 disc herniation and worse baseline pain or function. It is possible that the contribution of pain or dysfunction related to retrolisthesis was far overshadowed by the presence of symptoms caused by the concomitant disc herniation. It remains to be seen whether retrolisthesis will affect outcome after discectomy in these patients.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The Spine Journal
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Deyo R.A.
        • Bass J.E.
        Lifestyle and low-back pain. The influence of smoking and obesity.
        Spine. 1989; 14: 501-506
        • Videman T.
        • Battie M.
        A critical review of the epidemiology of idiopathic low back pain.
        in: Weinstein J.N. Gordon S. Low back pain: A scientific and clinical overview. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Rosemont, IL1996: 637-641
        • Vogt M.T.
        • Rubin D.
        • Valentin R.S.
        • et al.
        Lumbar olisthesis and lower back symptoms in elderly white women. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures.
        Spine. 1998; 23: 2640-2647
        • Vogt M.T.
        • Rubin D.A.
        • Palermo L.
        • et al.
        Lumbar spine listhesis in older African American women.
        Spine J. 2003; 3: 255-261
        • Lehmann T.
        • Brand R.
        Instability of the lower lumbar spine.
        Orthop Trans. 1983; 7: 97
        • Berlemann U.
        • Jeszenszky D.
        • Buhler D.
        • Harm J.
        Mechanisms of retrolisthesis in the lower lumbar spine. A radiographic study.
        Act Orthop Belg. 1999; 4: 427-477
        • Berlemann U.
        • Jeszenszky D.J.
        • Buhler D.W.
        • Harms J.
        The role of lumbar lordosis, vertebral end-plate inclination, disc height, and facet orientation in degenerative spondylolisthesis.
        J Spinal Disord. 1999; 12: 68-73
        • Boden S.D.
        • Riew K.D.
        • Yamaguchi K.
        • Branch T.P.
        • Schellinger D.
        • Wiesel S.W.
        Orientation of the lumbar facet joints: association with degenerative disc disease.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996; 78: 403-411
        • Grobler L.J.
        • Robertson P.A.
        • Novotny J.E.
        • Pope M.H.
        Etiology of spondylolisthesis. Assessment of the role played by lumbar facet joint morphology.
        Spine. 1993; 18: 80-91
        • Capasso G.
        • Maffulli N.
        • Testa V.
        Inter- and intratester reliability of radiographic measurement of spondlylolisthesis.
        Act Orthop Belg. 1992; 58: 188-192
        • Danielson B.
        • Frennered K.
        • Irstam L.
        Roentgenologic assessment of spondylolisthesis. I. A study of measurement variations.
        Acta Radiol. 1988; 29: 345-351
        • McAfee P.
        • Yuan H.
        Computed tomography in spondylolisthesis.
        Clin Orthop. 1982; 166: 62-71
        • Sato K.
        • Wakamatsu E.
        • Yoshizumi A.
        • Watanabe N.
        • Irei O.
        The configuration of the laminas and facet joints in degenerative spondylolisthesis. A clinicoradiologic study.
        Spine. 1989; 14: 1265-1271
        • Shaffer W.O.
        • Spratt K.F.
        • Weinstein J.
        • Lehmann T.R.
        • Goel V.
        1990 Volvo Award in clinical sciences. The consistency and accuracy of roentgenograms for measuring sagittal translation in the lumbar vertebral motion segment. An experimental model.
        Spine. 1990; 15: 741-750
        • Virta L.
        • Osterman K.
        Radiographic correlations in adult symptomatic spondylolisthesis: a long-term follow-up study.
        J Spinal Disord. 1994; 7: 41-48
        • Imada K.
        • Matsui H.
        • Tsuji H.
        Oophorectomy predisposes to degenerative spondylolisthesis.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995; 77: 126-130
        • Nachemson A.L.
        Instability of the lumbar spine. Pathology, treatment, and clinical evaluation.
        Neurosurg Clin N Am. 1991; 2: 785-790
        • Weinstein P.
        Lumbar stenosis.
        in: Hardy R. Lumbar disc disease. Raven Press, Ltd, New York, NY1993: 241-254
        • Landis J.R.
        • Koch G.G.
        The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.
        Biometrics. 1977; 33: 159-174
        • Andersson G.
        Epidemiology of spinal stenosis.
        in: Weinstein J.N. Gordon S. Low back pain: a scientific and clinical overview. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Rosemont, IL1996: 637-641
        • Frymoyer J.W.
        Degenerative spondylolisthesis: diagnosis and treatment.
        J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1994; 2: 9-15
        • Herkowitz H.N.
        Spine update. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
        Spine. 1995; 20: 1084-1090
        • Mardjetko S.
        • Sonnolly P.
        • Shott S.
        Degenerative spondylolisthesis: a meta-analysis of the literature 1970-1993.
        Spine. 1994; 20: S2256-S2265
        • Wiltse L.
        • Rothman S.
        Spondylolisthesis: classification, diagnosis and natural history.
        Semin Spine Surg. 1989; 1: 78-81