Review article| Volume 2, ISSUE 5, P357-371, September 2002

Download started.


Neurophysiological effects of spinal manipulation

  • Joel G Pickar
    Corresponding author. Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research, 1000 Brady Street, Davenport, IA 52803, USA. Tel.: (563) 884-5219; fax: (563) 884-5227.
    Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research, 1000 Brady Street, Davenport, IA 52803, USA
    Search for articles by this author


      Background context: Despite clinical evidence for the benefits of spinal maniputation and the apparent wide usage of it, the biological mechanisms underlying the effects of spinal manipulation are not known. Although this does not negate the clinical effects of spinal manipulation, it hinders acceptance by the wider scientific and health-care communities and hinders rational strategies for improving the delivery of spinal manipulation.
      Purpose: The purpose of this review article is to examine the neurophysiological basis for the effects of spinal manipulation. Study design: A review article discussing primarily basic science literature and clinically oriented basic science studies. Methods: This review article draws primarily from the peer-reviewed literature available on Medline. Several textbook publications and reports are referenced. A theoretical model is presented describing the relationships between spinal manipulation, segmental biomechanics, the nervous system and end-organ physiology. Experimental data for these relationships are presented. Results: Biomechanical changes caused by spinal manipulation are thought to have physiological consequences by means of their effects on the inflow of sensory information to the central nervous system. Muscle spindle afferents and Golgi tendon organ afferents are stimulated by spinal manipulation. Smaller-diameter sensory nerve fibers are likely activated, although this has not been demonstrated directly. Mechanical and chemical changes in the intervertebral foramen caused by a herniated intervertebral disc can affect the dorsal roots and dorsal root ganglia, but it is not known if spinal manipulation directly affects these changes. Individuals with herniated lumbar discs have shown clinical improvement in response to spinal manipulation. The phenomenon of central facilitation is known to increase the receptive field of central neurons, enabling either subthreshold or innocuous stimuli access to central pain pathways. Numerous studies show that spinal manipulation increases pain tolerance or its threshold. One mechanism underlying the effects of spinal manipulation may, therefore, be the manipulation's ability to alter central sensory processing by removing subthreshold mechanical or chemical stimuli from paraspinal tissues. Spinal manipulation is also thought to affect reflex neural outputs to both muscle and visceral organs. Substantial evidence demonstrates that spinal manipulation evokes paraspinal muscle reflexes and alters motoneuron excitability. The effects of spinal manipulation on these somatosomatic reflexes may be quite complex, producing excitatory and inhibitory effects. Whereas substantial information also shows that sensory input, especially noxious input, from paraspinal tissues can reflexively elicit sympathetic nerve activity, knowledge about spinal manipulation's effects on these reflexes and on end-organ function is more limited. Conclusions: A theoretical framework exists from which hypotheses about the neurophysiological effects of spinal manipulation can be developed. An experimental body of evidence exists indicating that spinal manipulation impacts primary afferent neurons from paraspinal tissues, the motor control system and pain processing. Experimental work in this area is warranted and should be encouraged to help better understand mechanisms underlying the therapeutic scope of spinal manipulation.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to The Spine Journal
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Druss B.G
        • Rosenheck R.A
        Association between use of uncoventional therapies and conventional medical services.
        JAMA. 1999; 282: 651-656
      1. Altman B, Lynn M. Use of alternative care providers by the adult population: utilization patterns and expenditures. Workshop presentation. National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine, June 14, 2000.

        • Eisenberg D.M
        • Davis R.B
        • Ettner S.L
        • et al.
        Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990–1997.
        JAMA. 2002; 280: 1569-1575
      2. Bigos S, Bowyer O, Braen G, et al. Acute low-back problems in adults. AHCPR Publication No. 95-0643. Rockville, MD, US Dept of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Agency for Health Care and Policy and Research. Clinical Practice Guideline, Quick Reference Guide Number 14, 1994.

        • Hurwitz E.L
        • Aker P.D
        • Adams A.H
        • Meeker W.C
        • Shekelle P.G
        Manipulation and mobilization of the cervical spine.
        Spine. 1996; 21: 1746-1760
        • Budgell B
        Spinal manipulative therapy and visceral disorders.
        Chiropractic J Austral. 1999; 29: 123-128
        • Bronfort G
        • Assendelft W.J
        • Evans R
        • Haas M
        • Bouter L
        Efficacy of spinal manipulation for chronic headache.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2001; 24: 457-466
        • Masarsky C.S
        • Todres-Masarsky C
        Somatovisceral aspects of chiropractic. Churchill-Livingstone, New York2001
        • Shekelle P.G
        • Adams A.H
        • Chassin M.R
        • Hurwitz E.L
        • Brook R.H
        Spinal manipulation for low-back pain.
        Ann Intern Med. 1992; 117: 590-598
        • Grice A
        • Vernon H
        Basic principles in the performance of chiropractic adjusting.
        in: Haldeman S Principles and practice of chiropractic. 2nd ed. Appleton and Lange, Norwalk1992: 443-458
        • Bergmann T.F
        Short lever, specific contact articular chiropractic technique.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1992; 15: 591-595
        • Bartol K.M
        Osseous manual thrust techniques.
        in: Gatterman M.I Foundations of chiropractic. 1st ed. Mosby, St. Louis1995: 88-104
        • Conway P.J.W
        • Herzog W
        • Zhang Y
        • Hasler E.M
        • Ladly K
        Forces required to cause cavitation during spinal manipulation of the thoracic spine.
        Clin Biomech. 1993; 8: 210-214
        • Brodeur R
        The audible release associated with joint manipulation.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1995; 18: 155-164
        • Haldeman S
        Spinal manipulative therapy; a status report.
        Clin Orthop. 1983; 179: 62-70
        • Hessel B.W
        • Herzog W
        • Conway P.J.W
        • McEwen M.C
        Experimental measurement of the force exerted during spinal manipulation using the Thompson technique.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1990; 13: 448-453
        • Herzog W
        • Conway P.J
        • Kawchuk G.N
        • Zhang Y
        • Hasler E.M
        Forces exerted during spinal manipulative therapy.
        Spine. 1993; 18: 1206-1212
        • Kawchuk G.N
        • Herzog W
        • Hasler E.M
        Forces generated during spinal manipulative therapy of the cervical spine.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1992; 15: 275-278
        • Kawchuk G.N
        • Herzog W
        Biomechanical characterization (fingerprinting) of five novel methods of cervical spine manipulation.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1993; 16: 573-577
        • Triano J
        • Schultz A.B
        Loads transmitted during lumbosacral spinal manipulative therapy.
        Spine. 1997; 22: 1955-1964
        • Nathan M
        • Keller T.S
        Measurement and analysis of the in vivo posteroanterior impulse response of the human thoracolumbar spine.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1994; 17: 431-441
        • Fuhr A.W
        • Smith D.C
        Accuracy of piezoelectric accelerometers measuring displacement of a spinal adjusting instrument.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1986; 9: 15-21
        • Smith D.B
        • Fuhr A.W
        • Davis B.P
        Skin accelerometer displacement and relative bone movement of adjacent vertebrae in response to chiropractic percussion thrusts.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1989; 12: 26-37
        • Gal J
        • Herzog W
        • Kawchuk G
        • Conway P
        • Zhang Y.T
        Biomechanical studies of spinal manipulative therapy (SMT).
        J CCA. 1994; 38: 11-24
        • Leach R.A
        The chiropractic theories. 3rd ed. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore1994
        • Gatterman M.I
        What's in a word?.
        in: Gatterman M.I Foundations of chiropractic. 1st ed. Mosby, St. Louis1995: 6-17
        • Triano J
        Interaction of spinal biomechanics and physiology.
        in: Anonymous principles and practice of chiropractic. 2nd ed. Appleton and Lange, Norwalk1992: 225-257
        • Gillette R.G
        A speculative argument for the coactivation of diverse somatic receptor populations by forceful chiropractic adjustments.
        Manual Med. 1987; 3: 1-14
        • Farfan H.F
        The scientific basis of manipulation procedures.
        in: Buchanan W.W Kahn M.F Laine V Rodnan G.P Scott J.T Zvaifler N.J Grahame R Clinics in rheumatic diseases. WB Saunders Company, Ltd, London1980: 159-177
        • Giles L.G.F
        Anatomical basis of low back pain. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore1989
        • Lewit K
        Manipulative therapy in rehabilitation of the locomotor system. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford1991
        • Haldeman S
        The clinical basis for discussion of mechanisms of manipulative therapy.
        in: Korr I.M The neurobiologic mechanisms in manipulative therapy. Plenum, New York1978: 53-75
      3. Vernon H. Biological rationale for possible benefits of spinal manipulation. Cherkin DC, Mootz RD. AHCPR Publication No. 98-N002, 105–115. 1997. Chiropractic in the United States: training, practice and research.

        • Wilder D.G
        • Pope M.H
        • Frymoyer J.W
        The biomechanics of lumbar disc herniation and the effect of overload and instability.
        J Spinal Disord. 1988; 1: 16-32
        • Triano J
        The mechanics of spinal manipulation.
        in: Herzog W Clinical biomechanics of spinal manipulation. Churchill Livingstone, New York2001: 92-190
        • Greenman P.E
        Principles of Manual Medicine. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore1989 (, p 4)
        • Korr I.M
        Proprioceptors and somatic dysfunction.
        J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1975; 74: 638-650
        • Whittingham W
        • Nilsson N
        Active range of motion in the cervical spine increases after spinal manipulation (toggle recoil).
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2001; 24: 552-555
        • Eldred E
        • Hutton R.S
        • Smith J.L
        Nature of the persisting changes in afferent discharge from muscle following its contraction.
        in: Homma S Understanding the stretch reflex. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, New York1976: 157-183
        • Buerger A.A
        Experimental neuromuscular models of spinal manual techniques.
        Manual Med. 1983; 1: 10-17
        • Brumagne S
        • Cordo P
        • Lysens R
        • Verschueren S
        • Swinnen S
        The role of paraspinal muscle spindles in lumbosacral position sense in individuals with and without low back pain.
        Spine. 2000; 25: 989-994
        • Brumagne S
        • Lysens R
        • Swinnen S
        • Verschueren S
        Effect of paraspinal muscle vibration on position sense of the lumbosacral spine.
        Spine. 1999; 24: 1328-1331
        • Wilder D.G
        • Aleksiev A.R
        • Magnusson M.L
        • Pope M.H
        • Spratt K.F
        • Goel V.K
        Muscular response to sudden load. A tool to evaluate fatigue and rehabilitation.
        Spine. 1996; 21: 2628-2639
        • Radebold A
        • Cholewicki J
        • Panjabi M.M
        • Patel T
        • Ch
        Muscle response pattern to sudden trunk loading in healthy individuals and in patients with chronic low back pain.
        Spine. 2000; 25: 947-954
        • Radebold A
        • Cholewicki J
        • Polzhofer G.K
        • Greene H.S
        Impaired postural control of the lumbar spine is associated with delayed muscle response times in patients with chronic idiopathic low back pain.
        Spine. 2001; 26: 724-730
        • Bolton P.S
        • Holland C.T
        An in vivo method for studying afferent fibre activity from cervical paravertebral tissue during vertebral motion in anaesthetised cats.
        J Neurosci Methods. 1998; 85: 211-218
        • Pickar J.G
        An in vivo preparation for investigating neural responses to controlled loading of a lumbar vertebra in the anesthetized cat.
        J Neurosci Methods. 1999; 89: 87-96
        • Pickar J.G
        • Wheeler J.D
        Response of muscle proprioceptors to spinal manipulative-like loads in the anesthetized cat.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2001; 24: 2-11
        • Colloca C.J
        • Keller T.S
        • Gunzburg R
        • Vandeputte K
        • Fuhr A.W
        Neurophysiologic response to intraoperative lumbosacral spinal manipulation.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2000; 23: 447-456
        • Cavanaugh J.M
        • El-Bohy A
        • Hardy W.N
        • Getchell T.V
        • Getchell M.L
        • King A.I
        Sensory innervation of soft tissues of the lumbar spine in the rat.
        J Orthop Res. 1989; 7: 378-388
        • Pickar J.G
        • McLain R.F
        Responses of mechanosensitive afferents to manipulation of the lumbar facet in the cat.
        Spine. 1995; 20: 2379-2385
        • Yamashita T
        • Cavanaugh J.M
        • Ozaktay C.A
        • Avramov A.I
        • King A.I
        Effect of substance P on mechanosensitive units of tissues around and in the lumbar facet joint.
        J Orthop Res. 1993; 11: 205-214
        • Abrahams V.C
        • Lynn B
        • Richmond F.J.R
        Organization and sensory properties of small myelinated fibers in the dorsal cervical rami of the cat.
        J Physiol. 1984; 347: 177-187
        • Beel J.A
        • Stodieck L.S
        • Luttges M.W
        Structural properties of spinal nerve roots.
        Exp Neurol. 1986; 91: 30-40
        • Berthold C.H
        • Carlstedt T
        • Corneliuson O
        Anatomy of the nerve root at the central-peripheral transitional region.
        in: Dyck P.J Peripheral neuropathy. 1st ed. WB Saunders Company, Philadelphia1984: 156-170
        • Thomas P.K
        • Berthold C.H
        • Ochoa J
        Microscopic anatomy of the peripheral nervous system.
        in: Dyck P.J Peripheral neuropathy. 1st ed. WB Saunders Company, Philadelphia1993: 28-91
        • Devor M
        • Obermayer M
        Membrane differentiation in rat dorsal root ganglia and possible consequences for back pain.
        Neurosci Letters. 1984; 51: 341-346
        • Rydevik B.L
        The effects of compression on the physiology of nerve roots.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1992; 15: 62-66
        • Howe J.F
        • Loeser J.D
        • Calvin W.H
        Mechanosensitivity of dorsal root ganglia and chronically injured axons:a physiological basis for the radicular pain of nerve root compression.
        Pain. 1977; 3: 27-41
        • Wall P.D
        • Devor M
        Sensory afferent impulses originate from dorsal root ganglia as well as from the periphery in normal and nerve injured rats.
        Pain. 1983; 17: 321-339
      4. Sharpless SK. Susceptibility of spinal roots to compression block. Goldstein M. (No. 15), 155–161. 1975. NINCDS-Research Status of Spinal Manipulation Therapy.

        • Ozaktay A.C
        • Kallakuri S
        • Cavanaugh J.M
        Phospholipase A2 sensitivity of the dorsal root and dorsal root ganglion.
        Spine. 1998; 23: 1297-1306
        • Olmarker K
        • Rydevik B
        • Hansson T
        • Holm S
        Compression-induced changes of the nutritional supply to the porcine cauda equina.
        J Spinal Disord. 1990; 3: 25-29
        • Cornefjord M
        • Olmarker K
        • Farley D.B
        • Weinstein J.N
        • Rydevik B
        Neuropeptide changes in compressed spinal nerve roots.
        Spine. 1995; 20: 670-673
        • Rydevik B.L
        • Myers R.R
        • Powell H.C
        Pressure increase in the dorsal root ganglion following mechanical compression. Closed compartment syndrome in nerve roots.
        Spine. 1989; 14: 574-576
        • Takahashi K
        • Shima I
        • Porter R.W
        Nerve root pressure in lumbar disc herniation.
        Spine. 1999; 24: 2003-2006
        • McCarron R.F
        • Wimpee M.W
        • Hudkins P.G
        • Laros G.S
        The inflammatory effect of nucleus pulposus. A possible element in the pathogenesis of low-back pain.
        Spine. 1987; 12: 760-764
        • Kawakami M
        • Tamaki T
        • Hayashi N
        • et al.
        Mechanical compression of the lumber nerve root alters pain-related behaviors induced by the nucleus pulposus in the rat.
        J Orthop Res. 2000; 18: 257-264
        • Yabuki S
        • Igarashi T
        • Kikuchi S
        Application of nucleus pulposus to the nerve root simultaneously reduces blood flow in dorsal root ganglion and corresponding hindpaw in the rat.
        Spine. 2000; 25: 1471-1476
        • Nygaard O.P
        • Mellgren S.I
        • Osterud B
        The inflammatory properties of contained and noncontained lumbar disc herniation.
        Spine. 1997; 22: 2484-2488
        • Chen C
        • Cavanaugh J.M
        • Ozaktay A.C
        • Kallakuri S
        • King A.I
        Effects of phospholipase A2 on lumbar nerve root structure and function.
        Spine. 1997; 22: 1057-1064
        • Floman Y
        • Liram N
        • Gilai A.N
        Spinal manipulation results in immediate H-reflex changes in patients with unilateral disc herniation.
        Eur Spine J. 1997; 6: 398-401
        • Stern P.J
        • Côte P
        • Cassidy J.D
        A series of consecutive cases of low back pain with radiating leg pain treated by chiropractors.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1995; 18: 335-342
        • Nwuga V.C
        Relative therapeutic efficacy of vertebral manipulation and conventional treatment in back pain management.
        Am J Phys Med. 1982; 61: 273-278
        • Burton A.K
        • Tillotson K.M
        • Cleary J
        Single-blind randomised controlled trial of chemonucleolysis and manipulation in the treatment of symptomatic lumbar disc herniation.
        Eur Spine J. 2000; 9: 202-207
        • Cook A.J
        • Woolf C.J
        • Wall P.D
        • McMahon S.B
        Dynamic receptive field plasticity in rat spinal cord dorsal horn following C-primary afferent input.
        Nature. 1987; 325: 151-153
        • Denslow J.S
        • Korr I.M
        • Krems A.D
        Quantitative studies of chronic facilitation in human motoneuron pools.
        Am J Physiol. 1947; 150: 229-238
        • Denslow J.S
        • Clough G.H
        Reflex activity in the spinal extensors.
        J Neurophysiol. 1941; 4: 430-437
        • Denslow J.S
        • Hassett C.C
        The central excitatory state associated with postural abnormalities.
        J Neurophysiol. 1942; 5: 393-401
        • Denslow J.S
        An analysis of the variability of spinal reflex thresholds.
        J Neurophysiol. 1944; 7: 207-215
        • Woolf C.J
        The dorsal horn.
        in: Wall P.D Melzack R Textbook of pain. 3rd ed. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh1994: 101-112
        • Melzack R
        • Wall P.D
        Pain mechanisms.
        Science. 1965; 150: 971-979
        • Besson J.-M
        • Chaouch A
        Peripheral and spinal mechanisms of nociception.
        Physiol Rev. 1987; 67: 67-186
        • Glover J.R
        • Morris J.G
        • Khosla T
        Back pain.
        Br J Indust Med. 1974; 31: 59-64
        • Terrett A.C.J
        • Vernon H.T
        Manipulation and pain tolerance.
        Am J Phys Med. 1984; 63: 217-225
        • Fischer A.A
        Pressure algometry over normal muscles. Standard values, validity and reproduceability of pressure threshold.
        Pain. 1986; 30: 115-126
        • Reeves J.L
        • Jaeger B
        • Graff-Radford S.B
        Reliability of the pressure algometer as a measure of myofascial trigger point sensitivity.
        Pain. 1986; 24: 313-321
        • Vernon H.T
        Pressure pain threshold evaluation of the effect of spinal manipulation on chronic neck pain.
        J CCA. 1988; 32: 191-194
        • Cote P
        • Silvano A.M
        • Vernon H
        • Mior S.A
        The short-term effect of a spinal manipulation on pain/pressure threshold in patients with chronic mechanical low back pain.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1994; 17: 364-368
        • Fields H.L
        • Basbaum A.I
        Central nervous system mechanisms of pain modulation.
        in: Wall P.D Melzack R Textbook of pain. 3rd ed. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh1994: 101-112
        • Szczudlik A
        • Lypka A
        Plasma immunoreactive beta-endorphin and enkephalin concentration in healthy subjects before and after electroacupuncture.
        Acupunct Electro-Ther Res. 1983; 8: 127-137
        • Hughes G.S.J
        • Lichstein P.R
        • Whitlock D
        • Harker C
        Response of plasma beta-endorphins to trancutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in healthy subjects.
        Phys Ther. 1984; 64: 1062-1066
        • Harber V.J
        • Sutton J.R
        Endorphins and exercise.
        Sports Med. 1984; 1: 154-171
        • Rosner A
        Endocrine disorders.
        in: Masarsky C.S Todres-Masarsky C Somatovisceral aspects of chiropractic an evidence-based approach. Churchill-Livingstone, New York2001: 187-202
        • Vernon H.T
        • Dhami M.S.I
        • Howley T.P
        • Annett R
        Spinal manipulation and beta-endorphin.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1986; 9: 115-123
        • Christian G.F
        • Stanton G.J
        • Sissons D
        • et al.
        Immunoreactive acth, b-endorphin, and cortisol levels in plasma following spinal manipulative therapy.
        Spine. 1988; 13: 1411-1417
        • Sanders G.E
        • Reinert O
        • Tepe R
        • Maloney P
        Chiropractic adjustive manipulation on subjects with acute low back pain.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1990; 13: 391-395
        • Clement-Jones V
        • Lowry P.J
        • Rees L.H
        • Besser G.M
        Development of a specific extracted radioimmunoassay for methionine enkephalin in human plasma and cerebrospinal fluid.
        J Endocrinol. 1980; 86: 231-243
        • Herzog W
        • Scheele D
        • Conway P.J
        Electromyographic responses of back and limb muscles associated with spinal manipulative therapy.
        Spine. 1999; 24: 146-153
        • Suter E
        • Herzog W
        • Conway P.J
        • Zhang Y.T
        Reflex response associated with manipulative treatment of the thoracic spine.
        J Neuromusculoskel Sys. 1994; 2: 124-130
        • Colloca C.J
        • Keller T.S
        Stiffness and neuromuscular reflex response of the human spine to posteroanterior manipulative thrusts in patients with low back pain.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2001; 24: 489-500
        • Suter E
        • McMorland G
        • Herzog W
        • Bray R
        Conservative lower back treatment reduces inhibition in knee-extensor muscles.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2000; 23: 76-80
        • Keller T.S
        • Colloca C.J
        Mechanical force spinal manipulation increases trunk muscle strength assessed by electromyography.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2000; 23: 585-595
        • Dishman J.D
        • Ball K.A
        • Burke J
        Central motor excitability changes after spinal manipulation, a transcranial magnetic stimulation study.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2002; 25: 1-9
        • Murphy B.A
        • Dawson N.J
        • Slack J.R
        Sacroiliac joint manipulation decreases the H-reflex.
        Electromyog Clin Neurophysiol. 1995; 35: 87-94
        • Dishman J.D
        • Bulbulian R
        Spinal reflex attenuation associated with spinal manipulation.
        Spine. 2000; 25: 2519-2525
        • Indahl A
        • Kaigle A.M
        • Reikeras O
        • Holm S.H
        Interaction between the porcine lumbar intervertebral disc, zygapophysial joints, and paraspinal muscles.
        Spine. 1997; 22: 2834-2840
      5. El-Bohy AA, Goldberg SJ, King AI. Measurement of facet capsular stretch [abstract]. Biomechanics Symposium 1987; American Society of Mechanical Engineers: ASME, NY, NY; 161–4.

        • Cramer G.D
        • Tuck N.R
        • Knudsen J.T
        • et al.
        Effects of side-posture positioning and side-posture adjusting on the lumbar zygapophyseal joints as evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2000; 23: 380-394
        • Unsworth A
        • Dowson D
        • Wright V
        “Cracking joints.”.
        Ann Rheum Dis. 1971; 30: 348-358
        • Zhu Y
        • Haldeman S
        • Starr A
        • Seffinger M.A
        • Su S
        Paraspinal muscle evoked cerebral potentials in patients with unilateral low back pain.
        Spine. 1993; 18: 1096-1102
        • Zhu Y
        • Haldeman S
        • Hsieh C.-Y.J
        • Wu P
        • Starr A
        Do cerebral potentials to magnetic stimulation of paraspinal muscles reflect changes in palpable muscle spasm, low back pain, and activity scores?.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2000; 23: 458-464
        • Proske U
        • Morgan D.L
        • Gregory J.E
        Thixotropy in skeletal muscle and in muscle spindles.
        Prog Neurobiol. 1993; 41: 705-721
        • Gregory J.E
        • Mark R.F
        • Morgan D.L
        • Patak A
        • Polus B
        • Proske U
        Effects of muscle history on the stretch reflex in cat and man.
        J Neurophysiol. 1990; 424: 93-107
        • Pickar J.G
        • Kang Y.M
        Short-lasting zstretch of lumbar paraspinal muscle decreases muscle spindle sensitivity to subsequent musclez stretch.
        J Neuromusculoskel Sys. 2001; 9: 88-96
        • Sato A
        • Swenson R.S
        Sympathetic nervous system response to mechanical stress of the spinal column in rats.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1984; 7: 141-147
        • Budgell B
        • Hotta H
        • Sato A
        Spinovisceral reflexes evoked by noxious and innocuous stimulation of the lumbar spine.
        J Neuromusculoskel Sys. 1995; 3: 122-130
        • Budgell B
        • Sato A
        • Suzuki A
        • Uchida S
        Responses of adrenal function to stimulation of lumbar and thoracic interspinous tissues in the rat.
        Neurosci Res. 1997; 28: 33-40
        • Fitzgerald M
        Capsaicin and sensory neurons—a review.
        Pain. 1983; 15: 109-130
        • Pickar J.G
        • Kang Y.M
        • Cobb T
        • Kenney M.J
        Mustard oil injected into lumbar multifidus muscle increases sympathetic nerve activity to spleen and kidney via a suprasegmental reflex.
        Soc Neurosci Abstr. 2001; 27 ([abstract]): 9
        • Brennan P.C
        • Graham M.A
        • Triano J.J
        • Hondras M.A
        • Anderson R.J
        Lymphocyte profiles in patients with chronic low back pain enrolled in a clinical trial.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1994; 17: 219-227
        • Deboer K.F
        • Schutz M
        • McKnight M.E
        Acute effects of spinal manipulation on gastrointestinal myoelectric activity in conscious rabbits.
        Manual Med. 1988; 3: 85-94
        • Budgell B
        • Suzuki A
        Inhibition of gastric motility by noxious chemical stimulation of interspinous tissues in the rat.
        J Autonom Nerv Sys. 2000; 80: 162-168
        • Sato A
        • Sato Y
        • Schmidt R.F
        The impact of somatosensory input on autonomic functions.
        in: Blaustein M.P Grunicke H Pette D Schultz G Schweiger M Reviews of physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology. Springer, Tokyo1997
        • Budgell B
        • Hirano F
        Innocuous mechanical stimulation of the neck and alterations in heart-rate variability in healthy young adults.
        Auton Neurosci Basic Clin. 2001; 91: 96-99
        • Brennan P.C
        • Kokjohn K
        • Kaltinger C.J
        • et al.
        Enhanced phagocytic cell respiratory burst induced by spinal manipulation.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1991; 14: 399-407
        • Brennan P.C
        • Triano J.J
        • McGregor M
        • Kokjohn K
        • Hondras M.A
        • Brennan D.C
        Enhanced neutrophil respiratory burst as a biological marker for manipulation forces.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1992; 15: 83-89
        • Habler H.-J
        • Eschenfelder S
        • Liu X.-G
        • Janig W
        Sympathetic-sensory coupling after L5 spinal nerve lesion in the rat and its relation to changes in dorsal root ganglion blood flow.
        Pain. 2000; 87: 335-345