« Previous
Next »
The Spine Journal
Volume 10, Issue 12
, Pages 1055-1064
, December 2010
The Chiropractic Hospital-based Interventions Research Outcomes (CHIRO) Study: a randomized controlled trial on the effectiveness of clinical practice guidelines in the medical and chiropractic management of patients with acute mechanical low back pain
References
- Clinical practice guideline number 14: acute low back problems in adults. Rockville, MD: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Public Service, US Department of Health and Human Services; 1994;65-0642
- . Scientific approach to the assessment and management of activity-related spinal disorders. A monograph for clinicians. Report of the Quebec Task Force on Spinal Disorders. Spine. 1987;12(7 Suppl):S1–S59
- . Clinical guidelines for the management of acute low back pain. London, UK: Royal College of General Practitioners; 1999;Available at: www.rcgp.org.ukAccessed June 4, 2001
- . Guide to assessing psychological yellow flags in acute low back pain: risk factors for long-term disability and work loss. Wellington, NZ: Accident Rehabilitation & Compensation Insurance Corporation of New Zealand and the National Health Committee; 1997;
- The role of activity in the therapeutic management of back pain. Report of the International Paris Task Force on Back Pain. Spine. 2000;25:1S–33S
- . Draft evidence based clinical guidelines for the management of acute low back pain. Australia: National Health and Medical Research Council; 2000;
- . Consensus Lumbosacral Radicular Syndrome. Utrecht, The Netherlands: CBO; 1995;
- Treatment guideline–backache. Drug Committee of the German Medical Society. [in German] Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 1997;91:457–460
- Lower back pain report from the Danish Society of Internal Medicine. Ugeskr Laeger. 1996;158:1–18
- Keel P, Perinin CH, Schutz-Petitjean D, et al. Chronicity of back pain: problematic issues. Final report of program National de Recherche No. 26B. Bale Editions EULAR. 1996.
- Low-back pain: frequency, management and prevention from an HTA perspective. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for Health Technology Assessment; 1999;
- Guidelines for treating low back pain in primary care. The Israeli low back pain guideline group. Harefuah. 1996;130:145–151224
- Clinical guidelines for the management of low back pain in primary care: an international comparison. Spine. 2001;26:2504–2513discussion 2513–4
- . Compliance with clinical practice guidelines in family physicians managing worker’s compensation board patients with acute lower back pain. Spine J. 2003;3:442–450
- . Knowledge transfer in family physicians managing patients with acute low back pain: a prospective randomized control trial. Spine J. 2006;6:282–288
- . Routine primary care management of acute low back pain: adherence to clinical guidelines. Eur Spine J. 2003;12:589–594
- . Clinical practice guidelines. Particular reference to the management of pain in the lumbosacral spine. Spine. 1996;21:1593–1596
- . Clinical guidelines in the management of low back pain. Baillieres Clin Rheumatol. 1998;12:17–35
- . Physician office visits for low back pain. Frequency, clinical evaluation, and treatment patterns from a U.S. national survey. Spine. 1995;20:11–19
- . Physician views about treating low back pain. The results of a national survey. Spine. 1995;20:1–10discussion 9–10
- . The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire. Spine. 2000;25:3115–3124
- . Minimal clinically important 21 difference. Low back pain: outcome measures. J Rheumatol. 2001;28:431–438
- . Effectiveness of spa therapy in chronic low back pain: a randomized clinical trial. J Rheumatol. 1995;22:1315–1320
- Safety, efficacy, and cost effectiveness of evidence-based guidelines for the management of acute low back pain in primary care. Spine. 2001;26:2615–2622
- . United Kingdom back pain exercise and manipulation (UK BEAM) randomised trial: effectiveness of physical treatments for back pain in primary care. BMJ. 2004;329:1377
- Assessment of diclofenac or spinal manipulative therapy, or both, in addition to recommended first-line treatment for acute low back pain: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2007;370:1638–1643
- Use of health status measures in patients with low back pain in clinical settings. Comparison of specific, generic and preference-based instruments. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2000;39:783–790
- . Clinical practice guideline-based treatment is not effective for all patients with acute lower back pain: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Spine J. 2008;8(Suppl):71S
FDA device/drug status: not applicable.
Author disclosures: MFSD (royalties, Medtronic; stock ownership, including options and warrants, Medtronic; consulting, Medtronic; research support: staff/materials, Medtronic; grants, Medtronic, DePuy Spine, Rick Hansen Foundation; fellowship support, Medtronic, Synthes, DePuy); CGF (royalties, Medtronic; consulting, Medtronic; speaking/teaching arrangements, Medtronic, DePuy, AO; trips/travel, Medtronic, DePuy, AO; research support: staff/materials, Medtronic, DePuy; fellowship support, Medtronic, Synthes).
PII: S1529-9430(10)01114-9
doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.08.019
© 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
The Spine Journal
Volume 10, Issue 12
, Pages 1055-1064
, December 2010
