The Spine Journal
Volume 10, Issue 6 , Pages 507-509, June 2010

Methodological problems associated with the present conceptualization of the minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit

  • Brian R. Theodore, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, University of Washington, PO Box 356540, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. Tel.: (206) 616-0158; fax: (206) 543-2958.

Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, University of Washington, PO Box 356540, Seattle, WA 98195, USA

Received 29 March 2010; accepted 7 April 2010.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.

 FDA device/drug status: not applicable.

 Author disclosures: none.

PII: S1529-9430(10)00299-8

doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2010.04.003

Refers to article:

  • Neck Disability Index, short form-36 physical component summary, and pain scales for neck and arm pain: the minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit after cervical spine fusion , 02 April 2010

    Leah Y. Carreon, Steven D. Glassman, Mitchell J. Campbell, Paul A. Anderson
    The Spine Journal June 2010 (Vol. 10, Issue 6, Pages 469-474)

The Spine Journal
Volume 10, Issue 6 , Pages 507-509, June 2010

Article Tools