« Previous
Next »
The Spine Journal
Volume 10, Issue 6
, Pages 514-529
, June 2010
Synthesis of recommendations for the assessment and management of low back pain from recent clinical practice guidelines
References
- . The Saskatchewan health and back pain survey. The prevalence of low back pain and related disability in Saskatchewan adults. Spine. 1998;23:1860–1866
- . Incidence and course of low back pain episodes in the general population. Spine. 2005;30:2817–2823
- . The treatment of neck and low back pain: who seeks care? who goes where?. Med Care. 2001;39:956–967
- Low back pain: early management of persistent non-specific low back pain. London, UK: Royal College of General Practitioners; 2009;
- The surgical management of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review. Spine. 2007;32:1791–1798
- . A systematic review of low back pain cost of illness studies in the United States and internationally. Spine J. 2008;8:8–20
- Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain: a joint clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:478–491
- . Acute low back pain: interdisciplinary clinical guidelines. Oslo, UK: The Norwegian Back Pain Network; 2002;
- Diagnostic therapeutic flow-charts for low back pain patients: the Italian clinical guidelines. Eura Medicophys. 2006;42:151–170
- The role of alternative medical providers for the outpatient treatment of insured patients with back pain. Spine. 2005;30:1454–1459
- . A supermarket approach to the evidence-informed management of chronic low back pain. Spine J. 2008;8:1–7
- Clinical guidelines for the management of low back pain in primary care: an international comparison. Spine. 2001;26:2504–2513
- Methods for evidence synthesis in interventional pain management. Pain Physician. 2003;6:89–111
- . Evidence synthesis and development of guidelines in interventional pain management. Pain Physician. 2005;8:73–86
- . Evidence-based medicine and the challenge of low back pain: where are we now?. Pain Pract. 2005;5:153–178
- . Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management, part I: introduction and general considerations. Pain Physician. 2008;11:161–186
- A critical review of guidelines for low back pain treatment. Eur Spine J. 2006;15:543–553
- Quality of primary care guidelines for acute low back pain. Spine. 2004;29:E357–E362
- Effects of two guideline implementation strategies on patient outcomes in primary care: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Spine. 2008;33:473–480
- . Does adherence to the guideline recommendation for active treatments improve the quality of care for patients with acute low back pain delivered by physical therapists?. Med Care. 2007;45:973–980
- Adherence of Irish general practitioners to European guidelines for acute low back pain: a prospective pilot study. Eur J Pain. 2007;11:614–623
- Clinical practices in the management of new-onset, uncomplicated, low back workers' compensation disability claims. J Occup Environ Med. 1999;41:397–404
- Physicians' initial management of acute low back pain versus evidence-based guidelines. Influence of sciatica. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:1132–1135
- Survey of acute low back pain management by specialty group and practice experience. J Occup Environ Med. 2006;48:723–732
- Do occupational health assessments match guidelines for low back pain?. Occup Med (Lond). 2008;58:485–489
- . Clinical management of occupational low back pain in Australia: what is the real picture?. J Occup Rehabil. 2008;18:375–380
- Content and outcome of usual primary care for back pain: a systematic review. Br J Gen Pract. 2008;58:790–797
- . Knowledge transfer in family physicians managing patients with acute low back pain: a prospective randomized control trial. Spine J. 2006;6:282–288
- . Compliance with clinical practice guidelines in family physicians managing worker's compensation board patients with acute lower back pain. Spine J. 2003;3:442–450
- . Routine primary care management of acute low back pain: adherence to clinical guidelines. Eur Spine J. 2003;12:589–594
- . Impact of national low back pain guidelines on clinical practice. South Med J. 2005;98:139–143
- . Computed tomography in low back pain and sciatica. A retrospective study of 132 patients in the Haute-Vienne district of France. Joint Bone Spine. 2002;69:589–596
- Adherence to radiography guidelines for low back pain: a survey of chiropractic schools worldwide. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2008;31:412–418
- Physiotherapy management of low back pain: does practice match the Dutch guidelines?. Aust J Physiother. 2005;51:35–41
- . Do Norwegian manual therapists provide management for patients with acute low back pain in accordance with clinical guidelines?. Man Ther. 2005;10:38–43
- . Management of work-related low back pain: a population-based survey of physical therapists. Phys Ther. 2005;85:1168–1181
- . Practice patterns of physiotherapists in the treatment of work-related back pain. J Eval Clin Pract. 2007;13:412–421
- Effect on the process of care of an active strategy to implement clinical guidelines on physiotherapy for low back pain: a cluster randomised controlled trial. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14:107–112
- Implementation of clinical guidelines on physical therapy for patients with low back pain: randomized trial comparing patient outcomes after a standard and active implementation strategy. Phys Ther. 2005;85:544–555
- Can guidelines impact the ordering of magnetic resonance imaging studies by primary care providers for low back pain?. Am J Manag Care. 2002;8:27–35
- . Physiotherapists and use of low back pain guidelines: a qualitative study of the barriers and facilitators. J Occup Rehabil. 2009;19:94–105
- European guidelines for the management of acute nonspecific low back pain in primary care. Eur Spine J. 2006;15(Suppl 2):S169–S191
- . Grey matters: a practical search tool for evidence-based medicine. Ottawa, Canada: Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; 2009;
- . Developing search strategies for clinical practice guidelines in SUMSearch and Google Scholar and assessing their retrieval performance. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007;7:28
- . Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: the AGREE project. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003;12:18–23
- Airaksinen O, Brox JL, Cedraschi C, et al. European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain in primary care. COST B13 Working Group on Guidelines for Chronic Low Back Pain, European Commission, 2005.
- . Evidence-based management of acute musculoskeletal pain. Brisbane, Australia: Australian Academic Press Pty. Ltd.; 2003;
- Chronic low back pain. Good Clinical practice (GCP). Brussels, Belgium: Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre (KCE); 2006;Report No.: 48 C (D/2006/10.273/71)
- . New Zealand acute low back pain guide. Wellington, New Zealand: Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC); 2004;
- . Low back pain: early management of persistent non-specific low back pain. London, UK: National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence; 2009;Report No.: NICE clinical guideline 88
- Interventional therapies, surgery, and interdisciplinary rehabilitation for low back pain: an evidence-based clinical practice guideline from the American Pain Society. Spine. 2009;34:1066–1077
- . Back pain, neck pain: an evidence based review. Summary and conclusions. Stockholm, Sweden: SBU—Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care; 2000;Report No.: 145
- . 2009 updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Back Review Group. Spine. 2009;34:1929–1941
- . Clinically important outcomes in low back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2005;19:593–607
- . Deriving a preference-based single index from the UK SF-36 Health Survey. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:1115–1128
- Can cost utility evaluations inform decision making about interventions for low back pain? A systematic review. Spine J. 2009;9:944–957
- Expenditures and health status among adults with back and neck problems. JAMA. 2008;299:656–664
- . The inclusion of reports of randomised trials published in languages other than English in systematic reviews. Health Technol Assess. 2003;7:1–90
- . Grey literature in meta-analyses. Nurs Res. 2003;52:256–261
FDA device/drug status: not applicable.
Author disclosures: SD (salary, Palladian Health; stock ownership, including options and warrants, Palladian Health; training grant, NCMIC Foundation; speaking and/or teaching arrangements, NCMIC Foundation); ACT (consulting, Palladian Health; research support: investigator salary, Palladian Health); SH (royalties, multiple publishing companies; stock ownership, including options and warrants, Palladian Health; consulting, Palladian Health, NCMIC Foundation, University of New York; speaking and/or teaching arrangements, multiple organizations; trips/travel, multiple meetings per prior field; scientific advisory board, NYCC; other office, WFC Research Council).
The authors are consultants, employees, or officers of Palladian Health, LLC, a company that manages specialty health benefits on behalf of other health insurers.
PII: S1529-9430(10)00288-3
doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.03.032
© 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
The Spine Journal
Volume 10, Issue 6
, Pages 514-529
, June 2010
