The Spine Journal
Volume 10, Issue 6 , Pages 497-504, June 2010

Three-dimensional dynamic in vivo motion of the cervical spine: assessment of measurement accuracy and preliminary findings

  • Colin P. McDonald, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Bone and Joint Center, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI 48202, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Bone and Joint Center, Henry Ford Hospital, 2799 W. Grand Blvd, E&R 2015, Detroit, MI 48202, USA. Tel.: (313) 916-2130; fax: (313) 916-8812.
  • ,
  • Casey C. Bachison, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI 48202, USA
  • ,
  • Victor Chang, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neurosurgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI 48202, USA
  • ,
  • Stephen W. Bartol, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI 48202, USA
  • ,
  • Michael J. Bey, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Bone and Joint Center, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI 48202, USA

Received 5 October 2009; received in revised form 18 January 2010; accepted 18 February 2010. published online 02 April 2010.

Abstract 

Background context

Previous research has quantified cervical spine motion with conventional measurement techniques (eg, cadaveric studies, motion capture systems, and fluoroscopy), but these techniques were not designed to accurately measure three-dimensional (3D) dynamic cervical spine motion under in vivo conditions.

Purpose

The purposes of this study were to characterize the accuracy of model-based tracking for measuring 3D dynamic cervical spine kinematics and to demonstrate its in vivo application.

Study design

Through accuracy assessment and application of technique, in vivo cervical spine motion was measured.

Methods

The accuracy of model-based tracking for measuring cervical spine motion was determined in an in vitro experiment. Tantalum beads were implanted into the vertebrae of an ovine specimen, and biplane X-ray images were acquired as the specimen's neck was manually moved through neck extension and axial neck rotation. The 3D position and orientation of each cervical vertebra were determined from the biplane X-ray images using model-based tracking. For comparison, the position and orientation of each vertebra were also determined by tracking the position of the implanted beads with dynamic radiostereometric analysis. To demonstrate in vivo application of this technique, biplane X-ray images were acquired as a human subject performed two motion tasks: neck extension and axial neck rotation. The positions and orientations of each cervical vertebra were determined with model-based tracking. Cervical spine motion was reported with standard kinematic descriptions of translation and rotation.

Results

The in vitro validation demonstrated that model-based tracking is accurate to within ±0.6 mm and ±0.6° for measuring cervical spine motion. For the in vivo application, there were significant rotations about all three anatomical axes for both the neck extension and axial neck rotation motion tasks.

Conclusions

Model-based tracking is an accurate technique for measuring in vivo, 3D, dynamic cervical spine motion. Preliminary data acquired using this technique are in agreement with previous studies. It is anticipated that this experimental approach will enhance our understanding of cervical spine motion under normal and pathologic conditions.

Keywords: Cervical spine, Motion analysis, Validation, In vivo, Dynamic

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 FDA device/drug status: not applicable.

 Author disclosures: SWB (private investments, including venture capital, start-ups, ISS Spine; other office, Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation Medical Board of Trustees).

PII: S1529-9430(10)00129-4

doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2010.02.024

The Spine Journal
Volume 10, Issue 6 , Pages 497-504, June 2010