The Spine Journal
Volume 10, Issue 4 , Pages 283-284 , April 2010

The rise and fall of the “minimum clinically important difference”

  • Eugene J. Carragee, MD (Editor-in-Chief)

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Stanford Medicine Outpatient Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, 450 Broadway St, Pavilion C-MC 6342, Redwood City, CA 94063, USA. Tel.: (650) 723-7797; fax: (650) 723-9805.

Received 4 February 2010 ,Accepted 6 February 2010.

References 

  1. Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH. Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials. 1989;10:407–415
  2. Slosar PJ, Reynolds JB, Schofferman J, et al. Patient satisfaction after circumferential lumbar fusion. Spine. 2000;25:722–726
  3. Copay AG, Martin MM, Subach BR, et al. Assessment of spine surgery outcomes: inconsistency of change amongst outcome measurements. Spine J. 2010;10:291–296
  4. Gatchel R, Mayer TG. Testing minimal clinically important difference: consensus or conundrum?. Spine J. 2010;10:321–327
  5. Glassman SD, Carreon L. Thresholds for Health-related Quality of Life measures: reality testing. Spine J. 2010;10:328–329
  6. Gatchel R, Mayer TG. Testing minimal clinically important difference: additional comments and scientific reality testing. Spine J. 2010;10:330–332
  7. Carragee EJ, Cheng I. Minimum acceptable outcomes after lumbar spinal fusion. Spine J. 2010;10:313–320

 FDA device/drug status: not applicable.

 Author disclosures: EJC (stock ownership, including options and warrants, Simpirica, Bioassetts, Cytonics; private investments, including venture capital, start-ups, Simpirica; consulting, Medtronic, Synthes, Well-Point B/C B/S; trips/travel, US army; scientific advisory board, Intrinsic Orthopedics, Cytonics; other office, Bioassetts; grants, AO Foundation; fellowship support, DePuy Spine; other relationships, Orthopaedic Surgeon).

PII: S1529-9430(10)00117-8

doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.02.013

The Spine Journal
Volume 10, Issue 4 , Pages 283-284 , April 2010