The Spine Journal
Volume 10, Issue 4 , Pages 313-320 , April 2010

Minimum acceptable outcomes after lumbar spinal fusion

  • Eugene J. Carragee, MD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Stanford Medicine Outpatient Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, 450 Broadway St, Pavilion C-MC 6342, Redwood City, CA 94063, USA. Tel.: (650) 723-7797; fax: (650) 723-9805.
  • ,
  • Ivan Cheng, MD

Received 1 February 2010 ,Accepted 4 February 2010.

References 

  1. Slosar PJ, Reynolds JB, Schofferman J, et al. Patient satisfaction after circumferential lumbar fusion. Spine. 2000;25:722–726
  2. Errico TJ. Lumbar disc arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;435:106–117
  3. Lafuente J, Casey AT, Petzold A, Brew S. The Bryan cervical disc prosthesis as an alternative to arthrodesis in the treatment of cervical spondylosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:508–512
  4. Anderson PA, Rouleau JP. Intervertebral disc arthroplasty. Spine. 2004;29:2779–2786
  5. Zanoli G, Stromqvist B, Jonsson B. Visual analog scales for interpretation of back and leg pain intensity in patients operated for degenerative lumbar spine disorders. Spine. 2001;26:2375–2380
  6. Fairbank J. Use of Oswestry disability index (ODI). Spine. 1995;20:1535–1537
  7. Zung WW. A self-rating depression scale. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1965;12:63–70
  8. Main CJ. The modified somatic perception questionnaire (MSPQ). J Psychosom Res. 1983;27:503–514
  9. Roland M, Fairbank J. The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire. Spine. 2000;25:3115–3124
  10. Hodges SD, Humphreys SC, Eck JC, et al. Predicting factors of successful recovery from lumbar spine surgery among workers' compensation patients. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2001;101:78–83
  11. Katz JN, Lipson SJ, Chang LC, et al. Seven- to 10-year outcome of decompressive surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine. 1996;21:92–98
  12. Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH. Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials. 1989;10:407–415
  13. Madan S, Boeree NR. Outcome of posterior lumbar interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion for spondylolytic spondylolisthesis. Spine. 2002;27:1536–1542
  14. Lee SH, Choi WG, Lim SR, et al. Minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion followed by percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for isthmic spondylolisthesis. Spine J. 2004;4:644–649
  15. Molinari RW, Sloboda JF, Arrington EC. Low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis treated with instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion in U.S. servicemen. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005;18(Suppl):S24–S29
  16. Moller H, Hedlund R. Instrumented and noninstrumented posterolateral fusion in adult spondylolisthesis—a prospective randomized study: part 2. Spine. 2000;25:1716–1721
  17. Potter BK, Freedman BA, Verwiebe EG, et al. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: clinical and radiographic results and complications in 100 consecutive patients. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005;18:337–346
  18. Fritzell P, Hägg O, Wessberg P, Nordwall A. SLSS Group. 2001 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Studies: lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain—a multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study group. Spine. 2001;26:2521–2532
  19. Ivar Brox J, Sorensen R, Friis A, et al. Randomized clinical trial of lumbar instrumented fusion and cognitive intervention and exercises in patients with chronic low back pain and disc degeneration. Spine. 2003;28:1913–1921
  20. Fairbank J, Frost H, Wilson-MacDonald J, et al. Randomised controlled trial to compare surgical stabilisation of the lumbar spine with an intensive rehabilitation programme for patients with chronic low back pain: the MRC spine stabilisation trial. BMJ. 2005;330:1233–1241

 FDA device/drug status: not applicable.

 Author disclosures: EJC (stock ownership, including options and warrants, Simpirica, Bioassetts, Cytonics; private investments, including venture capital, start-ups, Simpirica; consulting, Medtronic, Synthes, Well-Point B/C B/S; trips/travel, US Army; scientific advisory board, Intrinsic Orthopedics, Cytonics; other office, Bioassetts; grants, AO Foundation; fellowship support, DePuy Spine; other relationships, Orthopaedic Surgeon); IC (speaking/teaching arrangements, Stryker Spine; grants, Medtronic, Stryker Spine).

PII: S1529-9430(10)00099-9

doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.02.001

The Spine Journal
Volume 10, Issue 4 , Pages 313-320 , April 2010