« Previous
Next »
The Spine Journal
Volume 10, Issue 4
, Pages 313-320
, April 2010
Minimum acceptable outcomes after lumbar spinal fusion
References
- Patient satisfaction after circumferential lumbar fusion. Spine. 2000;25:722–726
- . Lumbar disc arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;435:106–117
- . The Bryan cervical disc prosthesis as an alternative to arthrodesis in the treatment of cervical spondylosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:508–512
- . Intervertebral disc arthroplasty. Spine. 2004;29:2779–2786
- . Visual analog scales for interpretation of back and leg pain intensity in patients operated for degenerative lumbar spine disorders. Spine. 2001;26:2375–2380
- . Use of Oswestry disability index (ODI). Spine. 1995;20:1535–1537
- . A self-rating depression scale. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1965;12:63–70
- . The modified somatic perception questionnaire (MSPQ). J Psychosom Res. 1983;27:503–514
- . The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire. Spine. 2000;25:3115–3124
- Predicting factors of successful recovery from lumbar spine surgery among workers' compensation patients. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2001;101:78–83
- Seven- to 10-year outcome of decompressive surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine. 1996;21:92–98
- . Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials. 1989;10:407–415
- . Outcome of posterior lumbar interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion for spondylolytic spondylolisthesis. Spine. 2002;27:1536–1542
- Minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion followed by percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for isthmic spondylolisthesis. Spine J. 2004;4:644–649
- . Low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis treated with instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion in U.S. servicemen. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005;18(Suppl):S24–S29
- . Instrumented and noninstrumented posterolateral fusion in adult spondylolisthesis—a prospective randomized study: part 2. Spine. 2000;25:1716–1721
- Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: clinical and radiographic results and complications in 100 consecutive patients. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005;18:337–346
- . SLSS Group. 2001 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Studies: lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain—a multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study group. Spine. 2001;26:2521–2532
- Randomized clinical trial of lumbar instrumented fusion and cognitive intervention and exercises in patients with chronic low back pain and disc degeneration. Spine. 2003;28:1913–1921
- Randomised controlled trial to compare surgical stabilisation of the lumbar spine with an intensive rehabilitation programme for patients with chronic low back pain: the MRC spine stabilisation trial. BMJ. 2005;330:1233–1241
FDA device/drug status: not applicable.
Author disclosures: EJC (stock ownership, including options and warrants, Simpirica, Bioassetts, Cytonics; private investments, including venture capital, start-ups, Simpirica; consulting, Medtronic, Synthes, Well-Point B/C B/S; trips/travel, US Army; scientific advisory board, Intrinsic Orthopedics, Cytonics; other office, Bioassetts; grants, AO Foundation; fellowship support, DePuy Spine; other relationships, Orthopaedic Surgeon); IC (speaking/teaching arrangements, Stryker Spine; grants, Medtronic, Stryker Spine).
PII: S1529-9430(10)00099-9
doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.02.001
© 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
The Spine Journal
Volume 10, Issue 4
, Pages 313-320
, April 2010
