« Previous
Next »
The Spine Journal
Volume 10, Issue 4
, Pages 341-349
, April 2010
Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics
References
- Biomechanical testing of an artificial cervical joint and an anterior cervical plate. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2003;16:314–323
- Adjacent level intradiscal pressure and segmental kinematics following a cervical total disc arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model. Spine. 2005;30:1165–1172
- Cervical disc replacement-porous coated motion prosthesis: a comparative biomechanical analysis showing the key role of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine. 2003;28:S176–S185
- Biomechanical analysis of rotational motions after disc arthroplasty: implications for patients with adult deformities. Spine. 2006;31(19 Suppl):S152–S160
- . Cervical spine arthroplasty biomechanics. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2005;16:589
- Influence of an artificial cervical joint compared with fusion on adjacent-level motion in the treatment of degenerative cervical disc disease. J Neurosurg. 2002;96(1 Suppl):17–21
- Changes in adjacent-level disc pressure and facet joint force after cervical arthroplasty compared with cervical discectomy and fusion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2007;7:33–39
- . A minimally disruptive technique for measuring intervertebral disc pressure in vitro: application to the cervical spine. J Biomech. 2001;34:545–549
- Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion. Spine. 2002;27:2431–2434
- . Intradiscal pressure recordings in the cervical spine. discussion 84–5 Neurosurgery. 1999;44:379–384
- Early results and review of the literature of a novel hybrid surgical technique combining cervical arthrodesis and disc arthroplasty for treating multilevel degenerative disc disease: opposite or complementary techniques?. Eur Spine J. 2009;18(Suppl 1):29–39
- . Sagittal split fractures in multilevel cervical arthroplasty using a keeled prosthesis. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2007;20:89–92
- Superiority of multilevel cervical arthroplasty outcomes versus single-level outcomes: 229 consecutive PCM prostheses. Spine. 2007;32:1337–1344
- . Internal stress distribution in cervical intervertebral discs: the influence of an artificial cervical joint and simulated anterior interbody fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2003;16:441–449
- . Hybrid multidirectional test method to evaluate spinal adjacent-level effects. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2007;22:257–265
- . Kinematic analysis and classification of vertebral motion. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1960;59:899–908contd
- . Biomechanical evaluation of spinal fixation devices: I. A conceptual framework. Spine. 1988;13:1129–1134
- . Anterior discectomy and fusion for painful cervical disc disease. A report of 50 patients with an average follow-up of 21 years. Spine. 1998;23:2047–2051
- . The indications for lumbar and cervical disc replacement. Spine J. 2004;4(6 Suppl):177S–181S
- Clinical experience with the new artificial cervical PCM (Cervitech) disc. Spine J. 2004;4(6 Suppl):315S–321S
- . Biomechanical effect of anterior cervical spine fusion on adjacent segments. Biomed Mater Eng. 1999;9:27–38
- Revision strategies for single- and two-level total disc arthroplasty procedures: a biomechanical perspective. Spine J. 2009;9:735–743
- Late radiographic findings after anterior cervical fusion for spondylotic myeloradiculopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993;18:2167–2173
- . Adjacent segment degeneration following fusion. In: Vacarro AR, Sasso R, Haid R, Papadopoulos S, Traynelis V editor. Spinal arthroplasty with DVD: the preservation of motion. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishers; 2007;p. 83–94
- . In vivo flexion/extension of the normal cervical spine. J Orthop Res. 1991;9:828–834
- Clinical validation of functional flexion/extension radiographs of the cervical spine. Spine. 1993;18:120–127
- Load-carrying capacity of the human cervical spine in compression is increased under a follower load. Spine. 2000;25:1548–1554
FDA device/drug status: not applicable.
Author disclosures: BWC (stock ownership, including options and warrants, Cervitech, Inc.; consulting, Kuros Biosurgery AG; speaking and/or teaching arrangements, DePuy Spine, Inc.; research support: investigator salary, Abbott Spine, DePuy Spine, Stryker Biotech, Kuros Biosurgery AG, Cerapedics, Inc., Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc., NuVasive, Inc., Flexuspine, Inc., Pioneer Surgical Technology, Inc., Globus Medical; research support: staff and/or materials, Abbott Spine, Flexuspine, Inc., NuVasive, Inc., Pioneer Surgical Technology, Inc., Globus Medical, Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc., Cerapedics, Inc., Kuros Biosurgery AG, Stryker Biotech, DePuy Spine, Inc.; grants, Pioneer Surgical); PCM (royalties, Globus Medical; stock ownership, including options and warrants, Breakaway Imaging-Medtronic; private investments, including venture capital, start-ups, Globus Medical, Cervitech, Inc.; consulting, Abbott Pharmaceutical; speaking and/or teaching arrangements, Pioneer Surgical; trips/travel, DePuy Spine, Inc.; board of directors, Disc Motion Technology; scientific advisory board, SpineMedica; other office, Bonovo; endowments, Impliant; fellowship support, Globus Medical).
PII: S1529-9430(10)00042-2
doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.01.006
© 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
The Spine Journal
Volume 10, Issue 4
, Pages 341-349
, April 2010
