« Previous
Next »
The Spine Journal
Volume 10, Issue 4
, Pages
341-349
, April 2010
Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics
To access this article, please choose from the options below
FDA device/drug status: not applicable.
Author disclosures: BWC (stock ownership, including options and warrants, Cervitech, Inc.; consulting, Kuros Biosurgery AG; speaking and/or teaching arrangements, DePuy Spine, Inc.; research support: investigator salary, Abbott Spine, DePuy Spine, Stryker Biotech, Kuros Biosurgery AG, Cerapedics, Inc., Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc., NuVasive, Inc., Flexuspine, Inc., Pioneer Surgical Technology, Inc., Globus Medical; research support: staff and/or materials, Abbott Spine, Flexuspine, Inc., NuVasive, Inc., Pioneer Surgical Technology, Inc., Globus Medical, Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc., Cerapedics, Inc., Kuros Biosurgery AG, Stryker Biotech, DePuy Spine, Inc.; grants, Pioneer Surgical); PCM (royalties, Globus Medical; stock ownership, including options and warrants, Breakaway Imaging-Medtronic; private investments, including venture capital, start-ups, Globus Medical, Cervitech, Inc.; consulting, Abbott Pharmaceutical; speaking and/or teaching arrangements, Pioneer Surgical; trips/travel, DePuy Spine, Inc.; board of directors, Disc Motion Technology; scientific advisory board, SpineMedica; other office, Bonovo; endowments, Impliant; fellowship support, Globus Medical).
PII: S1529-9430(10)00042-2
doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.01.006
© 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
The Spine Journal
Volume 10, Issue 4
, Pages
341-349
, April 2010
