Journal Home
Search for

Volume 9, Issue 12, Pages 1037-1038 (December 2009)


View previous. 15 of 19 View next.

Response shift phenomenon. Does this apply to spine outcomes research?

Paul A. Anderson, MDaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Leah Y. Carreon, MDb, Steven D. Glassman, MDb

Received 21 August 2009; accepted 21 August 2009. published online 12 October 2009.

Refers to article:
Understanding inconsistencies in patient-reported outcomes after spine treatment: response shift phenomena , 02 July 2009
Carolyn E. Schwartz, Joel A. Finkelstein
The Spine Journal
December 2009 (Vol. 9, Issue 12, Pages 1039-1045)
Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (301 KB)

COMMENTARY ON: Schwartz CE, Finkelstein JA. Understanding inconsistencies in patient-reported outcomes after spine treatment: response shift phenomenon. Spine J 2009;9:1039–1045 (in this issue).

a Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, K4/738 Clinical Science Center, University of Wisconsin, 600 Highland Ave., Madison, WI 53792, USA

b Leatherman Spine Center, Louisville, KY, USA

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, K4/738 Clinical Science Center, 600 Highland Ave., Madison, WI 53792, USA. Tel.: (608) 263-3207.

 FDA device/drug status: not applicable.

 Author disclosures: PAA (royalties, Stryker; stock ownership [including options and warrants], Pioneer; private investments [including venture capital, start-ups], Titan, Expanding Orthopedics; consulting: Pioneer, Medtronic; trips/travel, Medtronic; member scientific advisory board, Pioneer; grants, NASS); LYC (trips/travel, Medtronic Sofamor Danek); SDG (royalties, Medtronic; consulting, Medtronic, Depuy; trips/travel, Medtronic; research support [staff/or materials], Medtronic, Norton Healthcare; grants, Norton Healthcare Community Trust Fund; fellowship support, Norton Healthcare).

PII: S1529-9430(09)00810-9

doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2009.08.449


View previous. 15 of 19 View next.