Journal Home
Search for

Volume 9, Issue 12, Pages 1035-1036 (December 2009)


View previous. 14 of 19 View next.

Digital versus plain film imaging in the operating room: cost and safety considerations

Daniel K. Resnick, MDCorresponding Author Informationemail address

Received 5 August 2009; accepted 12 August 2009. published online 18 September 2009.

Refers to article:
Conventional versus digital radiographs for intraoperative cervical spine-level localization: a prospective time and cost analysis , 28 August 2009
Michael P. Steinmetz, Thomas E. Mroz, Ajit Krishnaney, Michael Modic
The Spine Journal
December 2009 (Vol. 9, Issue 12, Pages 967-971)
Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (184 KB)

COMMENTARY ON: Steinmetz MP, Mroz TEM, Krishnaney A, Modic M. Conventional vs. digital radiographs for intraoperative cervical spine-level localization: a prospective time and cost analysis. Spine J 2009;9:967–971 (in this issue).

Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Wisconsin Medical School, K4/834 CSC, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792, USA

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Wisconsin Medical School, K4/834 CSC, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792, USA. Tel.: (608) 263-9651; fax: (608) 263-1728.

 FDA device/drug status: not applicable.

 Author disclosures: DKR (consultant, Medtronic).

PII: S1529-9430(09)00358-1

doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2009.08.002


View previous. 14 of 19 View next.