The Spine Journal
Volume 9, Issue 8 , Pages 648-657 , August 2009

Effectiveness of a low back pain classification system

  • Hamilton Hall, MD, FRCSC

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    • CBI Health Group Research Department, 900-3300 Bloor St W, Toronto, Ontario M8X 2X2, Canada
  • ,
  • Greg McIntosh, MSc

      Affiliations

    • CBI Health Group Research Department, 900-3300 Bloor St W, Toronto, Ontario M8X 2X2, Canada
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: (416) 428-1030, (800) 463-2225; fax: (416) 231-0091.
  • ,
  • Christina Boyle, PT

      Affiliations

    • CBI Health Group Research Department, 900-3300 Bloor St W, Toronto, Ontario M8X 2X2, Canada

Received 5 November 2008 ,Accepted 17 April 2009.

References 

  1. Waddell G. The back pain revolution. 2nd ed.. Edinburgh, Scotland: Churchill Livingstone; 2004;
  2. Spratt K. Statistical relevance. In:  Fardon DF editors. Orthopaedic knowledge update: spine 2. Rosemont, IL: The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 2002;p. 497–505
  3. Kent P, Keating J. Do primary-care clinicians think that nonspecific low back pain is one condition?. Spine. 2004;29:1022–1031
  4. Chou R, Qaseem A, Snow V, et al. Clinical efficacy diagnosis and treatment of low back pain: a joint clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:478–491
  5. Deyo RA, Diehl AK. Patient satisfaction with medical care for low-back pain. Spine. 1986;11:28–30
  6. Boos N, Hodler J. What help and what confusion can imaging provide?. Baillieres Clin Rheum. 1998;12:115–139
  7. Yelland M. Diagnostic imaging for back pain. Aust Fam Physician. 2004;33:415–419
  8. Kikuchi S. Values and problems in MR imaging for the evaluation of low back pain (orthopedic surgeon's view). Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2001;5:127–128
  9. Hollingworth W, Dixon AK, Todd CJ, et al. Self reported health status and magnetic resonance imaging findings in patients with low back pain. Eur Spine J. 1998;7:369–375
  10. Savage RA, Whitehouse GH, Roberts N. The relationship between the magnetic resonance imaging appearance of the lumbar spine and low back pain, age and occupation in males. Eur Spine J. 1997;6:106–114
  11. Borenstein DG, O'Mara JW, Boden SD, et al. The value of magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine to predict low-back pain in asymptomatic subjects: a seven-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg. 2001;83-A:1306–1311
  12. Fukuda K, Kawakami G. Proper use of MR imaging for evaluation of low back pain (radiologist' view). Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2001;5:133–136
  13. Tacci JA, Webster BS, Hashemi L, Christiani DC. Clinical practices in the management of new-onset, uncomplicated, low back workers' compensation disability claims. J Occup Environ Med. 1999;41:397–404
  14. Breslau J, Seidenwurm D. Socioeconomic aspects of spinal imaging: impact of radiological diagnosis on lumbar spine-related disability. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2001;11:218–223
  15. Modic MT. Degenerative disc disease and back pain. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 1999;7:481–491
  16. Chou R, Fu R, Carrino JA, Deyo RA. Imaging strategies for low-back pain: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2009;373:463–472
  17. Donelson R. Rapidly Reversible Low Back Pain, Hanover NH, USA: SelfCare First LLC, 2007.
  18. Spitzer WO, Leblanc FE, Dupuis M, et al. Quebec Task Force on spinal disorders. Scientific approach to the assessment and management of activity-related spinal disorders: a monograph for clinicians. Spine. 1987;12:1–59
  19. Borkan JM, Koes B, Reis S, Cherkin DC. A report from the Second International Forum for primary care research on low back pain. Reexamining priorities. Spine. 1998;23:1992–1996
  20. Bouter LM, Pennick V, Bombardier C. Editorial Board of the Back Review Group. Cochrane back review group. Spine. 2003;28:1215–1218
  21. Leboeuf-Yde C, Lauritsen JM, Lauritzen T. Why has the search for causes of low back pain largely been nonconclusive?. Spine. 1997;22:877–881
  22. Delitto A. Research in low back pain: time to stop seeking the elusive “magic bullet”. Phys Ther. 2005;85:206–208
  23. Abraham I, Killackey-Jones B, Deyo R. Controversies in internal medicine. (Specific-v-non-specific diagnosis in low back pain.). Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:1442–1448
  24. McKenzie R. Mechanical diagnosis and therapy for low back pain: toward a better understanding. In:  Twomey L,  Taylor J editor. Physical therapy of the low back. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1987;p. 157–173
  25. Coste J, Paolaggi JB, Spira A. Classification of nonspecific low back pain: II. Clinical diversity of organic forms. Spine. 1992;17:1038–1042
  26. Delitto A, Erhard RE, Bowling RW. A treatment-based classification approach to low back syndrome: identifying and staging patients for conservative treatment. Phys Ther. 1995;75:470–489
  27. Leboeuf-Yde C. Low back pain: time to get off the treadmill. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2001;24:63–66
  28. Bouter LM, van Tulder MW, Koes BW. Methodologic issues in low back pain research in primary care. Spine. 1998;23:2014–2020
  29. Delitto A, Cibulka MT, Erhard RE, et al. Evidence for use of an extension-mobilization category in acute low back syndrome: a prescriptive validation pilot study. Phys Ther. 1993;73:216–228
  30. Erhard RE, Delitto A, Cibulka MT. Relative effectiveness of an extension program and a combined program of manipulation and flexion and extension exercises in patients with acute low back syndrome. Phys Ther. 1994;74:1093–1100
  31. Fritz JM, Delitto A, Erhard RE. Comparison of a classification-based approach to physical therapy and therapy based on clinical practice guidelines for patients with acute low back pain: a randomized clinical trial. Spine. 2003;28:1363–1372
  32. Hall, H. Acute care: non traumatic low back pain Chapter 18, IN: Orthopaedic Knowledge Update: Spine 2, AAOS, 153–66, 2002.
  33. Higgs J, Jones M. Clinical reasoning in the health professions. In:  Higgs J,  Jones M editor. Clinical reasoning in the health professions. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2000;p. 3–14
  34. Wilson L, Hall H, McIntosh G, Melles T. Inter-tester reliability of a low back pain classification system. Spine. 1999;24:248–254
  35. Hall H, McIntosh G, Melles T. A different approach to back pain diagnosis: identifying a pattern of pain. Can J Contin Med Educ. 1994;6:31–42
  36. Laslett M. Pain provocation tests for diagnosis of sacroiliac joint pain. Aust J Physiother. 2006;52:229
  37. Vleeming A, Albert HB, Ostgaard HC, Sturesson B, Stuge B. European guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pelvic girdle pain. Eur Spine J. 2008;17:794–819
  38. Hancock MJ, Maher CG, Latimer J, et al. Systematic review of tests to identify the disc, SIJ or facet joint as the source of low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2007;16:1539–1550
  39. Laslett M, Aprill CN, McDonald B, Young SB. Diagnosis of sacroiliac joint pain: validity of individual provocation tests and composites of tests. Man Ther. 2005;10:207–218
  40. Hall HA. Consultation with the back doctor. Toronto, Canada: McClelland & Stewart Ltd; 2003;Chapter 14
  41. Suda Y, Saitou M, Shibasaki K, et al. Gait analysis of patients with neurogenic intermittent claudication. Spine. 2002;27:2509–2513
  42. Porter RW. Spinal stenosis and neurogenic claudication. Spine. 1996;21:2046–2052
  43. Greenough CG, Fraser RD. Assessment of outcome in patients with low back pain. Spine. 1992;17:36–41
  44. McIntosh G. Back pain prognostic factors: a cohort study of 1,752 patients of a national rehabilitation clinic system. Masters of Science thesis in Epidemiology. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press, 1999.
  45. McIntosh G, Frank JW, Hogg-Johnson S, et al. Prognostic factors for time receiving workers' compensation benefits in a cohort of patients with low back pain. Spine. 2000;25:147–157
  46. Long A, Donelson R, Fung T. Does it matter which exercise? A randomized control trial of exercise for low back pain. Spine. 2004;29:2593–2602
  47. Manniche C, Asmussen K, Lauritsen B, et al. Low Back Pain Rating scale: validation of a tool for assessment of low back pain. Pain. 1994;57:317–326
  48. Lauridsen HH, Hartvigsen J, Manniche C, et al. Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference for pain and disability instruments in low back pain patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006;7:82
  49. Ostelol R, Deyo R, Stratford P, et al. Interpreting change scores for pain and functional status in low back pain: towards international consensus regarding minimal important change. Presented at: Palma International Forum IX, Primary Care Research on Low Back Pain; October 4–6, 2007; Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
  50. Childs JD, Piva SR, Fritz JM. Responsiveness of the numeric pain rating scale in patients with low back pain. Spine. 2005;30:1331–1334
  51. Hagg O, Fritzell P, Nordwall A. The clinical importance of changes in outcome scores after treatment for chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2003;12:12–20
  52. Riddle DL, Rothstein JM. Intertester reliability of McKenzie's classifications of the syndrome types present in patients with low back pain. Spine. 1993;18:1333–1344
  53. Childs JD, Fritz JM, Flynn TW, et al. Validation of a clinical prediction rule to identify patients with low back pain likely to benefit from spinal manipulation. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141:920–928
  54. Brennan GP, Fritz JM, Hunter SJ, et al. Identifying subgroups of patients with acute/subacute “nonspecific” low back pain: results of a randomized clinical trial. Spine. 2006;31:623–631
  55. Sackett DL. Bias in analytical research. J Chronic Dis. 1979;32:51–63
  56. Rose SJ. Physical therapy diagnosis: role and function. Phys Ther. 1989;96:535–537
  57. Fritz JM, George S. The use of a classification approach to identify subgroups of patients with acute low back pain: inter-rater reliability and short-term treatment outcomes. Spine. 2000;25:106–114
  58. Fritz JM, Brennan GP, Clifford SN, et al. An examination of the reliability of a classification algorithm for subgrouping patients with low back pain. Spine. 2006;31:77–82
  59. van der Heijden GJ, Beurskens AJ, Koes BW, et al. The efficacy of traction for back and neck: a systematic, blinded review of randomized clinical trial methods. Phys Ther. 1995;75:93–104

 Presented at: Canadian Spine Society, 8th Annual Meeting, March 12–15, 2008, Sun Peaks, British Columbia, Canada; International Society for the Study of the Lumbar Spine, 35th Annual Meeting, May 25–30, 2008, Geneva, Switzerland; North American Spine Society, 23rd Annual Meeting, October 14–18, 2008, Toronto, Canada; Society for Back Pain Research, Annual General Meeting, November 6–7, 2008, Staffordshire, England.

 FDA device/drug status: not applicable.

 Author disclosures: HH (medical director, CBI Health); GM (epidemiologist, CBI Health); CB (director of standards and accreditation, CBI Health).

PII: S1529-9430(09)00165-X

doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.04.017

The Spine Journal
Volume 9, Issue 8 , Pages 648-657 , August 2009