« Previous
Next »
The Spine Journal
Volume 9, Issue 9
, Pages 735-743
, September 2009
Revision strategies for single- and two-level total disc arthroplasty procedures: a biomechanical perspective
References
- In: Ahrens J editors. Normal joint mobility is maintained with an artificial disc prosthesis. Brussels, Belgium: International Society for Study of the Lumbar Spine (ISSLS); 1998;p. 56–57
- . Basic scientific considerations in total disc arthroplasty. Spine J. 2004;4:219S–230S
- . Biomechanical evaluation of total disc replacement arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model. Spine. 2003;28:S110–S117
- Multidirectional flexibility analysis of cervical artificial disc reconstruction: in vitro human cadaveric spine model. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005;2:188–194
- Effects of charite artificial disc on the implanted and adjacent spinal segments mechanics using a hybrid testing protocol. Spine. 2005;30:2755–2764
- . Biomechanics of lumbar arthroplasty. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2005;16:595–602
- . Artificial disc prosthesis: design concepts and criteria. Spine J. 2004;4:209S–218S
- . Development of a prosthetic intervertebral disc. Spine. 1991;16:S253–S255
- Intervertebral disc prosthesis. Results and prospects for the year 2000. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;337:64–76
- Clinical and radiological outcomes with the Charite artificial disc: a 10-year minimum follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005;18:353–359
- . Lumbar motion segment pathology adjacent to thoracolumbar, lumbar, and lumbosacral fusions. Spine. 1996;21:970–981
- Influence of an artificial cervical joint compared with fusion on adjacent-level motion in the treatment of degenerative cervical disc disease. J Neurosurg. 2002;96:17–21
- . Artificial disc replacement with the modular type SB Charite III: 2-year results in 50 prospectively studied patients. Eur Spine J. 1999;8:210–217
- . Biomechanical testing to identify adjacent-level effects. Calgary, Canada: World Congress of Biomechanics; 2002;
- . A minimally disruptive technique for measuring intervertebral disc pressure in vitro: application to the cervical spine. J Biomech. 2001;34:545–549
- Adjacent level intradiscal pressure and segmental kinematics following a cervical total disc arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model. Spine. 2005;30:1165–1172
- . Biomechanical evaluation of spinal fixation devices: I. A conceptual framework. Spine. 1988;13:1129–1134
- . The artificial disc: theory, design and materials. Biomaterials. 1996;17:1157–1167
- A multicenter retrospective study of the clinical results of the LINK SB Charite intervertebral prosthesis. The initial European experience. Spine. 1994;19:1842–1849
- Prospective randomized study of the Charite artificial disc: data from two investigational centers. Spine J. 2004;4:252S–259S
- A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part II: evaluation of radiographic outcomes and correlation of surgical technique accuracy with clinical outcomes. Spine. 2005;30:1576–1583discussion E1388–1590
- . SB Charite disc replacement: report of 60 prospective randomized cases in a US center. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2003;16:424–433
- Revisability of the CHARITE artificial disc replacement: analysis of 688 patients enrolled in the U.S. IDE study of the CHARITE Artificial Disc. Spine. 2006;31:1217–1226
- Biomechanical testing of an artificial cervical joint and an anterior cervical plate. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2003;16:314–323
- A follower load increases the load-carrying capacity of the lumbar spine in compression. Spine. 1999;24:1003–1009
- In vivo study of the kinematics in axial rotation of the lumbar spine after total intervertebral disc replacement: long-term results: a 10–14 years follow up evaluation. Eur Spine J. 2006;15:1501–1510
FDA device/drug status: approved for this indication (Charite Artificial Disc; ISOLA Pedicle Screw Spinal System).
Author disclosures: BWC, NH, HJB, HS, JCS, PCM (funding, nonprofit foundation).
PII: S1529-9430(09)00144-2
doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.03.011
© 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
The Spine Journal
Volume 9, Issue 9
, Pages 735-743
, September 2009
