The Spine Journal
Volume 9, Issue 7 , Pages 523-529, July 2009

Thoracoscopic anterior instrumented fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with emphasis on the sagittal plane

  • Baron S. Lonner, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, NY, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. 212 E 69th Street, New York, NY 10021. Tel.: (212) 737-554; fax: (212) 737-1369.
  • ,
  • Joshua D. Auerbach, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
  • ,
  • Rafael Levin, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, NY, USA
  • ,
  • David Matusz, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY, USA
  • ,
  • Carrie L. Scharf, BA

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, NY, USA
  • ,
  • Georgia Panagopoulos, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY, USA
  • ,
  • Alok D. Sharan, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA

Received 15 March 2007; accepted 17 November 2008. published online 12 January 2009.

Abstract 

Background context

Anterior fusion through an open thoracotomy restores kyphosis more reliably than posterior techniques in patients with thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Video-assisted thoracoscopic spinal fusion and instrumentation (VATS) minimizes the morbidity, from soft tissue and muscle dissection that accompanies traditional open thoracotomy. To our knowledge, there has not been a comprehensive analysis of VATS with respect to radiographic and clinical outcomes in the sagittal plane.

Purpose

To measure the radiographic and clinical outcomes after VATS with emphasis on the sagittal plane.

Study design/setting

A retrospective, radiographic review of 26 consecutive patients with Lenke type-I AIS who underwent VATS.

Methods

Radiographs of 26 consecutive patients with Lenke type-I AIS curves operated by a single surgeon were retrospectively reviewed after VATS. Sagittal and coronal parameters were compared with reported data for open anterior and posterior procedures.

Results

There was an increase in kyphosis from baseline to final follow-up by 6.6° (25%) from T2 to T12 (p<.0001), 8.7° (50%) from T5 to T12 (p<.0001), and 8° (54%) in the instrumented segment (p<.0001). Junctional kyphosis did not occur. No differences were detected in sagittal measurements between the first postoperative erect and the final radiographs. Patients experienced significant improvements from baseline to 2 years in Scoliosis Research Society-22 Health-Related Quality-of-Life Outcome Questionnaire scores (p<.0001).

Conclusions

Video-assisted thoracoscopic spinal fusion and instrumentation, in agreement with results reported for open anterior instrumentation, reliably restores or increases thoracic kyphosis while preserving junctional alignment in thoracic AIS.

Keywords: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, VATS, Sagittal alignment, Junctional kyphosis

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 FDA device/drug status: not applicable.

 Author disclosures: none.

PII: S1529-9430(08)01438-1

doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2008.11.005

The Spine Journal
Volume 9, Issue 7 , Pages 523-529, July 2009