The Spine Journal
Volume 9, Issue 2 , Pages 128-133, February 2009

Sagittal balance influences range of motion: an in vivo study with the ProDisc-C

  • Doron Rabin, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Neurosurgery, London Health Sciences Center, London, Ontario N6A 5A5, Canada
  • ,
  • Rudolf Bertagnoli, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Spine Center, St. Elisabeth Klinikum, Straubing, Germany
  • ,
  • Nicholas Wharton, MS

      Affiliations

    • Medical Metrics, Inc., Houston, TX, USA
  • ,
  • Gwynedd E. Pickett, MD FRCS(C)

      Affiliations

    • Division of Neurosurgery, London Health Sciences Center, London, Ontario N6A 5A5, Canada
  • ,
  • Neil Duggal, MD FRCS(C)

      Affiliations

    • Division of Neurosurgery, London Health Sciences Center, London, Ontario N6A 5A5, Canada
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Division of Neurosurgery, London Health Sciences Center, University of Western Ontario, 339 Windermere Road, Room A10-314, London, ON N6A 5A5, Canada. Tel.: (519) 663-2926; fax: (519) 663-3982.

Received 10 July 2007; accepted 3 January 2008. published online 11 July 2008.

Abstract 

Background context

Cervical arthroplasty is designed to maintain cervical motion of the functional spinal unit after cervical discectomy. The impact of the ProDisc-C (Synthes Spine, Paoli, PA) on in vivo kinematics and sagittal alignment requires further assessment.

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to test the hypothesis that the ProDisc-C increases range of motion (ROM) in flexion and extension at the surgical level, and assess its impact on cervical alignment.

Study design

Clinical study.

Patient sample

Fifteen patients with a mean age of 49 years were included in this study. Each patient had a single-level arthroplasty. Patients with multilevel arthroplasty, previous cervical spine surgery, and length of follow-up less than 6 months were excluded from this study.

Outcome measure

Lateral dynamic radiographs of the cervical spine were analyzed using quantitative measurement analysis (QMA) preoperatively and postoperatively. QMA software was also used to determine the ROM and sagittal translation at the surgical level.

Methods

Flexion/extension lateral radiographs of the cervical spine were prospectively collected and reviewed in 15 patients preoperatively and at early (1–3 months) and late (6–14 months) follow-up after placement of the ProDisc-C. Shell angle (SA) and C2–C7 Cobb angles were measured. Sagittal translation and ROM were calculated at each time point. Preoperative values were compared with early and late follow-up values using paired Student t tests and Pearson's correlation.

Results

The C2–C7 Cobb angle did not change significantly after surgery. Segmental ROM increased significantly from neutral to flexion (p=.02) and neutral to extension (p=.002) at late follow-up. SA correlated significantly with ROM from neutral to extension (Pearson's r=−0.55; p=.02) and translation from neutral to extension (Pearson's r=−0.58; p=.02).

Conclusions

The ProDisc-C increased overall segmental ROM. A lordotic SA may be associated with restricted segmental ROM and translation in extension. This study did not detect any change in overall cervical spinal alignment after insertion of the device.

Keywords: Arthroplasty, ProDisc-C, Spinal kinematics, Degenerative disc disease, Range of motion, Kyphosis

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 FDA device/drug status: investigational/not approved (ProDisc-C).

 The author, RB, acknowledges a financial relationship (consultant and lecturer for Synthes Spine) that may indirectly relate to the subject of this research.

PII: S1529-9430(08)00051-X

doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2008.01.009

The Spine Journal
Volume 9, Issue 2 , Pages 128-133, February 2009