The Spine Journal
Volume 9, Issue 1 , Pages 60-69, January 2009

Transverse sacral fractures

  • Luis A. Robles, MD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationLucerna 148, Col. Versalles, Puerto Vallarta Jal, Mexico, CP 48310, Mexico. Tel.: (52) 322-293-1991.

Section of Neurosurgery, Hospital San Javier Marina, Blvd. Fco Medina Ascencio #2760, Zona hotelera norte, Puerto Vallarta Jalisco, Mexico

Received 1 May 2007; accepted 16 August 2007. published online 05 November 2007.

Abstract 

Background context

Transverse sacral fractures (TSFs) are an uncommon type of sacral fractures. They are classified as zone III sacral fractures, but often the fracture line involves the three zones of Denis classification. A classification of TSF has been described previously but it only includes high TSF, different types of injuries as low TSF or special types of TSF are not included in this classification. Some authors advocate conservative treatment and others advocate surgical treatment for these fractures. Because TSF is an uncommon entity, spine surgeons have limited experience treating this kind of injury and consequently, a well-designed treatment protocol for these fractures does not exist.

Purpose

To review current principles in the evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment of TSFs.

Study design/setting

A literature review on TSFs.

Methods

A MEDLINE search in the English language literature was performed from 1975 to 2006. To be included in the study, it was strictly necessary for every case to provide information about the neurological status, type of treatment, and outcome. Articles in which this information was not properly mentioned were eliminated.

Results

The literature searching yielded 29 articles reporting 90 patients experiencing TSF, all of them were case reports or case series. High TSF are more frequent than low TSF and usually are caused by high-energy accidents. Ninety seven percent of patients presented some type of neurological impairment ranging from radiculopathy to bowel-bladder disturbance (BBD). Regarding the treatment, the outcome was reported using different criteria and for this reason is not possible to definitively conclude what treatment modality is the best for the treatment of TSF; however, the information obtained from every case suggest that patients treated surgically have better outcomes regarding stability and neurological status.

Conclusions

Even though both are TSF, high and low TSF have many different characteristics, the only common characteristic they share is the high incidence of cauda equina disturbance. Evidence suggests that the neurological outcome depends mainly on the anatomic characteristics of nerve roots under the fracture and severity of fracture's displacement.

Keywords: Transverse sacral fractures, Upper sacral fractures, Sacrum fractures

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 FDA device/drug status: not applicable.Nothing of value received from a commercial entity related to this article.

PII: S1529-9430(07)00804-2

doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2007.08.006

The Spine Journal
Volume 9, Issue 1 , Pages 60-69, January 2009