The Spine Journal
Volume 9, Issue 2 , Pages 147-168, February 2009

High-quality controlled trials on preventing episodes of back problems: systematic literature review in working-age adults

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

Received 29 October 2008; accepted 5 November 2008.

Abstract 

Background context

Back problems (BPs), with their cost and disability, are a substantial burden for individuals, employers, and society.

Purpose

This systematic review of controlled trials evaluates the effectiveness of interventions to prevent BP episodes in working age adults.

Data sources

We searched MEDLINE/EMBASE through May 2007, and COCHRANE/Trials Registry through August 22, 2008 using search terms of back pain, back injuries or sciatica, linked to prevention, control, workplace interventions, or ergonomics and searched article bibliographies.

Study selection

For systematic review inclusion, articles had to describe prospective controlled trials of interventions to prevent BPs in working-age adults, with intervention assignment either to individual participants or preexisting groups. Of 185 articles identified as potentially relevant, 20 trials (11%) met inclusion criteria.

Data extraction

Researchers extracted relevant information from controlled trials and graded methodological quality. Because of heterogeneity of trials, meta-analysis was not performed.

Results

Only exercise was found effective for preventing self-reported BPs in seven of eight trials (effect size 0.39 to >0.69). Other interventions were not found to reduce either incidence or severity of BP episodes compared with controls. Negative trials included five trials of education, four of lumbar supports, two of shoe inserts, and four of reduced lifting programs.

Conclusions

Twenty high-quality controlled trials found strong, consistent evidence to guide prevention of BP episodes in working-age adults. Trials found exercise interventions effective and other interventions not effective, including stress management, shoe inserts, back supports, ergonomic/back education, and reduced lifting programs. The varied successful exercise approaches suggest possible benefits beyond their intended physiologic goals.

Level of evidence

Systematic review Level I evidence.

Keywords: Back pain, Back injury, Back pain disability, Systematic review, Primary prevention, Back belts, Lifting, Exercise, Ergonomics

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 FDA device/drug status: not applicable.

 Nothing of value received from a commercial party related to this article.

PII: S1529-9430(08)01430-7

doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2008.11.001

The Spine Journal
Volume 9, Issue 2 , Pages 147-168, February 2009